Key result
Baseline plasma concentration of lipoprotein(a) was not associated with future risk of total or thromboembolic stroke in healthy middle-aged men (RR 1.03 for >95th percentile; P=NS).
Why the study?
Does elevated baseline lipoprotein(a) concentration increase the risk of future stroke in healthy middle-aged men?
Case-Control (n=14,916)
Does elevated baseline lipoprotein(a) concentration increase the risk of future stroke in healthy middle-aged men?
Baseline plasma concentration of lipoprotein(a) does not appear to be associated with future risk of total or thromboembolic stroke in healthy middle-aged men.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Lp(a) measurement should not inform stroke risk assessment in middle-aged men; leaves open its role in other populations or outcomes.
Objective. —To assess prospectively the risk of future stroke associated with baseline concentration of lipoprotein(a), abbreviated Lp(a). Design. —Nested case-control study using baseline plasma samples. Setting. —Men in the Physicians' Health Study. Participants. —A cohort of 14 916 male physicians with no prior history of stroke, transient ischemic attack, or myocardial infarction provided plasma samples at baseline and were followed prospectively for 7.5 years. Samples from 198 physicians who subsequently developed stroke (155 thromboembolic, 35 hemorrhagic, eight indeterminate) were analyzed for Lp(a) concentration together with paired controls, matched for age and smoking habit. Main Outcome Measure. —Fatal and nonfatal stroke. Results. —Median Lp(a) concentration (8.88 mg/dL [0.23 mmol/L] vs 8.55 mg/dL [0.22 mmol/L]),P=.69) and overall distributions of Lp(a) (P=.54) were similar at baseline in men who did and did not develop future stroke. In analyses controlling for age, smoking status, blood pressure, obesity, and the presence of diabetes, the relative risks (RRs) associated with baseline Lp(a) concentration exceeding the 25th, 50th, 75th, 90th, and 95th percentiles of the control distribution were 1.26, 0.99,1.06, 0.90, and 1.03 (allPvalues nonsignificant). There was likewise no association in analyses limited to thromboembolic events. For example, among subjects with baseline Lp(a) values exceeding the 95th percentile of the control distribution, the RR of future thromboembolic stroke was 1.01 (P=.9). No evidence of association between Lp(a) and stroke risk was found in analyses limited to individuals with hypercholesterolemia. Conclusions. —Among nearly 15000 predominantly white, healthy, middleaged men followed in the Physicians' Health Study for a period of 7.5 years, we found no evidence of association between baseline plasma concentration of Lp(a) and future risk of total or thromboembolic stroke. (JAMA. 1995;273:1269-1273)
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
P. M. Ridker (1995) conducted a case-control in Stroke (n=14,916). Baseline plasma concentration of lipoprotein(a) vs. Lower percentiles of Lp(a) was evaluated on Fatal and nonfatal stroke (RR 1.03, p=nonsignificant). Baseline plasma concentration of lipoprotein(a) was not associated with future risk of total or thromboembolic stroke in healthy middle-aged men (RR 1.03 for >95th percentile; P=NS).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: