Key result
Qishen Yiqi dripping pills will be evaluated for efficacy and safety as a complementary treatment for heart failure in this updated systematic review and meta-analysis protocol.
Why the study?
Existing trials of Qishen Yiqi Dripping pills for heart failure are often small with poor quality, and prior systematic reviews have major defects.
Does Qishen Yiqi Dripping pills (QSYQ) combined with routine western medicine improve clinical efficacy, all-cause death, and readmission rates in patients with heart failure?
Systematic Review
Does Qishen Yiqi Dripping pills (QSYQ) combined with routine western medicine improve clinical efficacy, all-cause death, and readmission rates in patients with heart failure?
This is a protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis designed to evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of Qishen Yiqi dripping pills as a complementary treatment for heart failure.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
QSYQ plus western medicine may improve HF outcomes and safety; leaves open need for rigorous RCTs before practice adoption.
BACKGROUND: Heart failure (HF) has become a serious global public health issue due to its high incidence, high mortality and extremely low quality of life. According to several clinical trials, Qishen Yiqi Dripping pills (QSYQ) combined with routine western medicine treatment can further enhance the curative effect of HF patients. However, most of the trials are small in sample size and poor in quality, which can only provide limited evidence-based medicine. The existing systematic reviews of efficacy and safety has provided evidence for the clinical application of QSYQ to a certain extent, but there are still 3 major defects. Here, we will perform a systematic review and meta-analysis that include the randomized clinical trial (RCT) of CACT-IHF, apply meta-regression and subgroup analysis to cope with multiple confounding factors, and add the clinical efficacy standards of TCM, all-cause death and readmission rates as reliable efficacy evaluation indicators. The purpose of this study was to rigorously evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of QSYQ in the complementary treatment of HF with a well-designed systematic review and meta-analysis. METHODS: Following the strict search strategy, 9 databases will be searched to ensure a comprehensive search. We search the database from the establishment until November 30, 2020. This study will include RCTs of QSYQ in HF patients' complementary treatment. Two searchers will independently draft and carry out the search strategy, and the third member will further complete it. Two members independently screen literature, extract data and cross-check, and solve different opinions through discussion or negotiation with the third member. The risk bias will be evaluated based on Cochrane tool of risk of bias. Meta-regression and subgroup analysis are used to check and deal with the heterogeneity. The data analysis will be conducted by the statistical software Stata 16.0. RESULTS: The results of this research will be delivered in a peer-reviewed journal. CONCLUSION: This study expects to provide credible and scientific evidence for the efficacy and safety of QSYQ in HF's complementary treatment, and at the same time provide a convenient and effective choice for decision-makers and patients. PROTOCOL REGISTRATION NUMBER: INPLASY 2020120106. ETHICAL APPROVAL: Since this study is on the basis of published or registered RCTs, ethical approval and informed consent of patients are not required.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Guan et al. (2021) conducted a systematic review in Heart failure. Qishen Yiqi dripping pills vs. Routine western medicine treatment was evaluated on Effective rate, all-cause mortality, emergency treatment/readmission due to HF, and other cardiovascular outcomes. Qishen Yiqi dripping pills will be evaluated for efficacy and safety as a complementary treatment for heart failure in this updated systematic review and meta-analysis protocol.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: