Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Forty-two patients (forty-four hips) who, at an age of less than forty-five years, had a total hip replacement without cement for the treatment of non-inflammatory osteoarthrosis, were followed for three to seven years (average, four and one-half years). At the latest follow-up evaluation, thirty-seven hips (84 per cent) had an excellent Harris rating; three (7 per cent), good; one (2 per cent), fair; and three (7 per cent), poor. The mean Harris hip score was 92 points, compared with 43 points before the operation. Two hips (5 per cent) had a revision due to complications. In another hip, there was a progressive radiolucent line around the femoral component, increased shedding of beads, and a low score for fixation and stability, according to the criteria of Engh et al. We concluded that total hip arthroplasty without cement, at least for the time-period studied, has a high rate of success for the management of patients less than forty-five years old who have non-inflammatory osteoarthrosis of the hip.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mont et al. (1993) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: