Key result
Percutaneous interventions within the coronary sinus increased the overall success rate of CRT implantation from 88% to 98% (P<0.05).
Why the study?
Do percutaneous interventions within the coronary sinus improve the success rate of left ventricular lead implantation in patients undergoing CRT?
Observational (n=8)
No
Do percutaneous interventions within the coronary sinus improve the success rate of left ventricular lead implantation in patients undergoing CRT?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Percutaneous interventions within the coronary sinus, such as balloon angioplasty and stenting, are feasible and safe options to overcome technical difficulties during left ventricular lead implantation for CRT.
BACKGROUND: Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) becomes a "gold standard" in therapy of selected patients with advanced heart failure. We set out to evaluate the feasibility and safety of percutaneous interventions within coronary sinus (CS) and their effect on the success rate of left ventricular (LV) lead implantation during CRT. METHODS: The study analyzed eight consecutive patients with the indications for CRT, who needed additional procedures within CS to overcome technical problems during left ventricular (LV) electrode implantation. The analyzed group consisted of three subgroups: patients in whom percutaneous balloon angioplasty within CS was needed (n = 4); patients with acute instability of the lead, requiring stenting of the vein to fix the electrode (n = 2); and patients with the stenting of CS due to late dislocation of the lead (n = 2). Success rate, procedure duration, fluoroscopy, complications, and electrical parameters of leads were analyzed. RESULTS: Success rate of the procedures was 87.5%; additional interventions increased overall efficacy of CRT implantation at our center from 88% to 98% (P < 0.05). Procedure duration (155.0 minute) and fluoroscopy time (42.5 minute) remained acceptable for the patient and operator; however, both were higher than in the procedures performed routinely in our hospital. Electrical properties of the LV leads were stable and within normal ranges during the observation period. We noted two local dissections of CS during the procedure, which remained clinically silent. CONCLUSION: Percutaneous interventions within CS seem to be feasible and safe treatment options, which can improve the short- and long-term success rates of CRT.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kowalski et al. (2006) conducted an observational in Advanced heart failure requiring cardiac resynchronization therapy (n=8). Percutaneous interventions within the coronary sinus (balloon angioplasty or stenting) vs. Routine CRT implantation without additional coronary sinus interventions was evaluated on Overall efficacy of CRT implantation (p=<0.05). Percutaneous interventions within the coronary sinus increased the overall success rate of CRT implantation from 88% to 98% (P<0.05).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: