Key result
Successful percutaneous coronary intervention of a chronic total occlusion was associated with improved survival compared with unsuccessful PCI.
Why the study?
Does successful percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) improve survival in patients with chronic total coronary occlusion compared to unsuccessful PCI?
Cohort (n=13,443)
Yes
Does successful percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) improve survival in patients with chronic total coronary occlusion compared to unsuccessful PCI?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Successful PCI of chronic total occlusions is associated with significantly improved long-term survival, particularly when complete revascularization is achieved.
BACKGROUND: Chronic total occlusion (CTO) is common, being reported in 18% to 30% of patients undergoing coronary angiography. Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is usually performed to relieve anginal symptoms, but data are emerging to suggest that there may also be a mortality benefit. OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to compare outcomes of patients with successful versus unsuccessful PCI to a CTO. METHODS: We analyzed the U.K. Central Cardiac Audit Database for all CTO PCI cases carried out in England and Wales between January 1, 2005, and December 31, 2009. Vital status in September 2010 was obtained from the Medical Research Information Service. RESULTS: A total of 13,443 patients (78.8% male) had a mean age of 63.5 years and underwent 14,439 CTO procedures. CTO PCI was successful in 10,199 cases (70.6%). During follow-up of 2.65 years (interquartile range: 1.59 to 3.83 years), successful PCI of at least 1 CTO was associated with improved survival (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.72; 95% CI: 0.62 to 0.83; p < 0.001). Complete revascularization was associated with improved survival compared with partial revascularization (HR: 0.70; 95% CI: 0.56 to 0.87; p = 0.002) or failed revascularization (HR: 0.61; 95% CI: 0.50 to 0.74; p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Successful CTO PCI was associated with improved long-term survival. The improvement was greatest in patients when complete revascularization was achieved. The identity of the successfully treated occluded vessel was not associated with differences in outcome.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
George et al. (2014) conducted a cohort in Chronic total coronary occlusion (CTO) (n=13,443). Successful CTO PCI vs. Unsuccessful CTO PCI was evaluated on Survival (HR 0.72, 95% CI 0.62 to 0.83, p=< 0.001). Successful percutaneous coronary intervention of a chronic total occlusion was associated with improved survival compared with unsuccessful PCI.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: