Key result
Clinical predictors including chronic immunomodulator therapy (OR 3.79; 95% CI 1.10-13.04) and hemodialysis (OR 3.24) were associated with increased odds of CIED-related infective endocarditis.
Why the study?
What are the clinical predictors of cardiovascular implantable electronic device-related infective endocarditis (CIED-IE) in patients presenting with CIED infection?
Observational (n=416)
No
What are the clinical predictors of cardiovascular implantable electronic device-related infective endocarditis (CIED-IE) in patients presenting with CIED infection?
Odds Ratio: 3.79 (95% CI 1.1–13.04)
Systemic manifestations of infection and specific comorbidities strongly predict CIED-related infective endocarditis, whereas isolated pocket site infection is negatively associated, helping guide the use of transesophageal echocardiography.
May aid risk stratification in CIED infection; leaves open whether predictors should guide TEE use.
BACKGROUND: Cardiovascular implantable electronic device (CIED)-related infective endocarditis (CIED-IE) is a serious complication of cardiac device infection and is associated with increased mortality. At present, there exist no criteria to predict CIED-IE in patients who present with CIED infection. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed all cases of CIED infection seen at Mayo Clinic Rochester between 1991 and 2008. CIED-IE was classified using pathologic and clinical criteria. Clinical predictors of CIED-IE were identified using logistic regression, and quantified using a summary score and plotted against the distribution of CIED-IE. RESULTS: Ninety-three (22.4%) of the 416 patients with CIED infection had CIED-IE. Host factors including chronic immunomodulator therapy exclusive of corticosteroid (odds ratio [OR], 3.79 [confidence interval (CI) 1.10, 13.04]), chronic corticosteroid therapy (OR, 2.15 [CI 0.93, 5.00]), hemodialysis (OR, 3.24 [CI 1.39, 7.55]), or remote infection (OR, 1.77 [CI 0.99, 3.14]) were associated with increased odds of CIED-IE. Patients with CIED-IE were at increased odds of presenting with fever (OR, 3.78 [CI 1.93, 7.40]), or malaise (OR, 1.87 [CI 1.02, 3.41]), and have findings of leukocytosis (OR, 3.61 [CI 1.51, 8.62]). In marked contrast, they were at decreased odds of exhibiting signs/symptoms of infection at the generator pocket site (OR, 0.19 [CI 0.10, 0.36]). Summary scores of 6 and 11 predicted CIED-IE in approximately 50% and 90% of cases, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Certain comorbid conditions and systemic manifestations of infection were associated with CIED-IE. In contrast, pocket site infection was negatively associated with CIED-IE. These findings should assist clinicians in identifying patients who would more likely benefit from further investigation of CIED-IE with transesophageal echocardiography.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Le et al. (2011) conducted an observational in Cardiovascular implantable electronic device (CIED) infection (n=416). Clinical predictors (e.g., chronic immunomodulator therapy, hemodialysis) vs. Absence of clinical predictors was evaluated on Cardiovascular implantable electronic device-related infective endocarditis (CIED-IE) (OR 3.79, 95% CI 1.10-13.04). Clinical predictors including chronic immunomodulator therapy (OR 3.79; 95% CI 1.10-13.04) and hemodialysis (OR 3.24) were associated with increased odds of CIED-related infective endocarditis.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: