Why the study?
Does PCI of noninfarct-related arteries improve outcomes in patients with STEMI and multivessel CAD?
Does PCI of noninfarct-related arteries improve outcomes in patients with STEMI and multivessel CAD?
Emerging evidence from randomized trials suggests that complete revascularization (PCI of nonculprit vessels) at the time of primary PCI for STEMI improves patient outcomes, challenging older guidelines that recommended against this practice.
May support complete revascularization in STEMI multivessel disease; leaves open optimal timing and patient selection.
Multivessel coronary artery disease (CAD) is found in up to 60% of the patients presenting with an ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and worsens the prognosis proportional to the extent of CAD severity. However, the 2013 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association STEMI guidelines, based on mostly observational data, had recommended against a routine noninfarct-related artery percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). After these guidelines were published, a handful of randomized trials became available, and they suggested that PCI of significant lesions in a noninfarct-related artery at the time of primary PCI might result in improved patient outcomes. The incidence of major adverse cardiac events was significantly reduced by 55% at 1 year and 65% at 2 years in patients undergoing angiographically guided PCI of nonculprit vessels at the time of primary PCI, in 2 different randomized trials. Fractional flow reserve-guided PCI of nonculprit vessels in this setting has also been shown to reduce cardiac events by 44% at 1 year. Meta-analyses of both nonrandomized and randomized trials have also suggested that complete revascularization at the time of STEMI significantly improves outcomes, including long-term all-cause mortality. In view of the emerging data, a focused update on primary PCI was published in 2015 and suggested that PCI of noninfarct-related arteries might be considered in selected patients. This article is a comprehensive review of the literature on the treatment of multivessel CAD in patients with STEMI, which provides the reader a critical analysis of the available information to determine the best therapeutic approach.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pineda et al. (2016) conducted a review in Multivessel coronary artery disease with ST-elevation myocardial infarction. Percutaneous coronary intervention of noninfarct-related arteries was evaluated.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: