Key result
The ACE DD genotype was significantly associated with a more than two-fold increased risk of diabetic nephropathy compared to type 2 diabetes without nephropathy (OR 2.22).
Why the study?
Given reports that ACE modulates plasma lipids and dyslipidemia is a critical risk factor for diabetic nephropathy, the study evaluated the influence of ACE I/D gene polymorphism and dyslipidemia status on diabetic nephropathy predisposition and progression.
Does ACE I/D gene polymorphism associate with the risk of diabetic nephropathy and dyslipidemia in type 2 diabetic patients?
Case-Control (n=600)
Yes
Does ACE I/D gene polymorphism associate with the risk of diabetic nephropathy and dyslipidemia in type 2 diabetic patients?
Odds Ratio: 2.22 (95% CI 1.44–3.39)
Absolute Event Rate: 42.5% vs 25%
p-value: p=<0.001
The ACE DD genotype is an independent risk factor for the development of diabetic nephropathy, while the ID genotype may offer a protective effect in dyslipidemic patients.
Supports ACE genotyping for nephropathy risk stratification in type 2 diabetes; leaves open prospective validation before clinical use.
Introduction: Diabetic nephropathy (DN) is the commonest single cause of end-stage renal failure, and dyslipidemia is a critical risk factor in the occurrence of DN. In the light of recent reports emphasizing the importance of angiotensin I-converting enzyme (ACE) in the modulation of plasma lipids, we sought to evaluate the influence of ACE I/D gene polymorphism with dyslipidemia status among type 2 diabetic (T2D) patients with and without nephropathy in the genetic predisposition and the progression to DN. Method: This study comprised of 600 subjects, which include patients with DN, T2D, and healthy controls (HC). Polymerase chain reaction based genotyping of ACE I/D polymorphism was performed and appropriate statistical analysis was done.Results: Out of the 600 subjects, 20 (10%) of the HC, 73 (36.5%) of the T2D group, and 125 (62.5%) of the DN subjects had dyslipidemia. The D allele (0.62) and DD (42.5) genotype frequencies were higher in the DN group in comparison with T2D and HC (P < 0.05). The genotypes also varied among patients with dyslipidemia (χ2 5.04; P < 0.05) but not in the non-dyslipidemia group. Under the co-dominant model, DD genotype conferred a risk of 1.26 (P < 0.001) toward DN, whereas the ID genotype offered protection from DN among the dyslipidemic subjects (OR = 0.05; P < 0.01). In addition, genotype-dependent difference was seen in the plasma lipid levels among study groups. A multiple logistic regression analysis revealed male gender, BMI, HbA1c, TG, HDL, and ACE DD genotype as independent risk factors for the development of DN. Conclusion: The study showed a significant predisposing association of ACE DD genotype with DN and protective effect of ID genotype on DN in the dyslipidemia subgroup.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jahan et al. (2020) conducted a case-control in Diabetic nephropathy (n=600). ACE I/D gene polymorphism (DD genotype) vs. ID or II genotype was evaluated on Development of diabetic nephropathy (DN vs T2D) (OR 2.22, 95% CI 1.44-3.39, p=<0.001). The ACE DD genotype was significantly associated with a more than two-fold increased risk of diabetic nephropathy compared to type 2 diabetes without nephropathy (OR 2.22).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: