Key result
Unsupported deep water running did not produce a graded physiological response, and regression equations for heart rate predicting VO2 differed significantly by gender and support method.
Why the study?
Does unsupported deep water running alter the relationship between heart rate and oxygen consumption compared to vest-supported running in healthy young adults?
Cross-Sectional (n=33)
Does unsupported deep water running alter the relationship between heart rate and oxygen consumption compared to vest-supported running in healthy young adults?
The relationship between heart rate and oxygen consumption during deep water running differs significantly based on gender and whether a support vest is used.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Heart rate may not reliably estimate intensity during unsupported deep water running; leaves open need for gender- and support-specific validation in aquatic training.
The purpose of this study was to investigate the relationship between heart rate and oxygen consumption (VO2) during the performance of unsupported and supported deep water running (DWR) in young healthy males and females. A second purpose was to compare regression of predicted VO2 on heart rate between the two methods of support (i.e., unsupported vs vest supported). Thirty‐three college‐aged students (18 males and 15 females), aged 19 to 28 years, volunteered for this study. Each subject completed practice sessions until satisfactory DWR performance was attained. Subjects returned for a VO2peak test in the water on a subsequent day. The test involved the performance of a DWR graded exercise test at a metronome cadence of 72 strides‐min−1 with a cadence increase of 12 strides min”1 in each subsequent 3 minute stage. Heart rate and VO2 were monitored continuously throughout the test. Statistical analysis of the difference in physiological stimulus between supported and unsupported DWR in female and male subjects was made using simple linear regression. F‐ratios were developed from the residual sum of squares of a restricted and unrestricted model to test the proposed hypotheses. It was shown that unsupported DWR is a mode of exercise that does not produce a graded physiological response. This study demonstrated that during unsupported DWR heart rate predicts VO2 in ml‐min−1 ‐kg−1 with the highest correlation coefficient and the lowest standard error in both gender groups. All developed regression equations were statistically different between gender and between the two methods of support.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Brown et al. (1998) conducted a cross-sectional in Healthy (n=33). Unsupported deep water running vs. Vest supported deep water running was evaluated on Regression of predicted VO2 on heart rate. Unsupported deep water running did not produce a graded physiological response, and regression equations for heart rate predicting VO2 differed significantly by gender and support method.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: