Key result
Robotic aortic valve replacement was successfully performed in 5 patients with 0% incidence of incisional conversions, deaths, strokes, or reoperations for bleeding.
Observational (n=5)
Robotic aortic valve replacement using the da Vinci system is feasible and can be performed without major early complications.
Robotic AVR feasible in small series; leaves open safety, durability, and generalizability pending larger prospective trials.
We report our initial experience with aortic valve replacement using robotic assistance. All procedures were performed with peripheral cardiopulmonary bypass, transthoracic aortic cross-clamp, and antegrade cold crystalloid cardioplegia. One or two ports and a 5-cm intercostal incision in the right chest were used for access. All patients had aortic valve replacement performed robotically. Between February and September 2004, five patients underwent robotic aortic valve replacement. The mean age was 59 years (range 35-82 years). There were no incisional conversions, death, stokes, or reoperations for bleeding. Overall mean study times were as follows: procedure, 231.2 min (range 180-315 min); cardiopulmonary bypass, 121.5 min (range 83-173 min), and cross-clamp, 98.2 min (range 67-140 min). One patient developed postoperative pneumonia. Aortic valve replacement can be successfully performed with the da Vinci robotic system.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Folliguet et al. (2005) conducted an observational in Aortic valve disease requiring replacement (n=5). Robotic aortic valve replacement was evaluated on Incisional conversions, death, strokes, or reoperations for bleeding. Robotic aortic valve replacement was successfully performed in 5 patients with 0% incidence of incisional conversions, deaths, strokes, or reoperations for bleeding.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: