Key result
Routine preprocedural radial artery angiography in STEMI patients was associated with lower access site bleeding complications (4.3% vs 6.8%, P<0.0001) and reduced TRA crossover.
Why the study?
Does routine preprocedural radial artery angiography reduce access site bleeding and access crossover in STEMI patients?
Cohort (n=5,068)
Does routine preprocedural radial artery angiography reduce access site bleeding and access crossover in STEMI patients?
Routine preprocedural radial artery angiography during STEMI interventions is associated with reduced access site bleeding, shorter procedural times, and lower rates of access crossover.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Should not yet change STEMI practice; hypothesis-generating, needs RCTs to confirm benefit.
AIMS: To assess the benefit of routine preprocedural radial artery (RA) angiography in patients with ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). METHODS AND RESULTS: All consecutive STEMI patients, in the period from January 2010 until December 2016 were included in the study. Preprocedural radial artery angiography was performed in all patients since March 2011. We compared clinical and procedure characteristics, access site bleeding complications and failure of primary chosen TRA between two groups of STEMI patients before and after we started performing routine RA angiography. We compared 762 STEMI patients from 2010 until March 2011 and 4306 STEMI patients after March 2011 until December 2016. Mean age of patients was 60 ± 11 years with 73% males. The latter group had more elderly and obese patients (P < .0001 both). Prior percutaneous coronary interventions was present in 7% of patients and 0, 1% had prior coronary bypass surgery. Procedure duration (38 ± 16 vs. 32 ± 20 min) was significantly longer in the first group (P value < .0001), but contrast volume (120 ± 33 vs. 110 ± 35 ml), and fluoroscopy time (8.6 ± 6 vs. 8.7 ± 8 min) were similar in both groups. Access crossover from primary TRA was 4, 6% in the first group, with a significant decrease to 3, 1% in the second (P < .0001), after introducing preprocedural RA angiography. Access site bleeding complications were significantly higher in the first group 6.8% vs. 4.3% in the second (p < .0001). CONCLUSION: Routine preprocedural radial artery angiography in STEMI patients is associated with lower rate of access site bleeding complications and reduced overall procedural time and TRA crossover rate.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zafirovska et al. (2018) conducted a cohort in ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) (n=5,068). Routine preprocedural radial artery angiography vs. No routine preprocedural radial artery angiography (historical control) was evaluated on Access site bleeding complications (p=<0.0001). Routine preprocedural radial artery angiography in STEMI patients was associated with lower access site bleeding complications (4.3% vs 6.8%, P<0.0001) and reduced TRA crossover.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: