Key result
The REACH-HF home-based cardiac rehabilitation intervention plus usual care resulted in a greater gain in disease-specific health-related quality of life compared to usual care alone.
Why the study?
Does the REACH-HF home-based cardiac rehabilitation intervention plus usual care improve disease-specific health-related quality of life in patients >18 years with heart failure compared to usual care alone?
Meta-Analysis
randomly assigned
Does the REACH-HF home-based cardiac rehabilitation intervention plus usual care improve disease-specific health-related quality of life in patients >18 years with heart failure compared to usual care alone?
A home-based cardiac rehabilitation program involving caregivers improves disease-specific health-related quality of life in patients with heart failure.
Supports broader adoption of caregiver-inclusive home-based cardiac rehabilitation in heart failure; extends Level 1 evidence for accessible program alternatives.
Rehabilitation EnAblement in CHronic Heart Failure (REACH-HF) is a home-based cardiac rehabilitation intervention designed for patients with heart failure and their caregivers. We present a pooled analysis of patients >18 years with a confirmed diagnosis of HF recruited to two REACH-HF randomized controlled trials. Where identified by patients and consented to participate, caregivers were randomly assigned with patients to receive the REACH-HF intervention plus usual care or usual care alone. Our analysis demonstrated that compared to control group, the REACH-HF group had a greater gain in their disease-specific health-related quality of life at follow-up.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Noonan et al. (2023) conducted a meta-analysis in heart failure. REACH-HF intervention plus usual care vs. usual care alone was evaluated on disease-specific health-related quality of life. The REACH-HF home-based cardiac rehabilitation intervention plus usual care resulted in a greater gain in disease-specific health-related quality of life compared to usual care alone.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: