Key result
The media:lumen ratio of small resistance vessels was significantly correlated with forearm minimal vascular resistance (r = 0.74, P < 0.001).
Why the study?
Does the direct measurement of media:lumen ratio correlate with the indirect measurement of minimal vascular resistance in human small resistance arteries?
Cross-Sectional (n=34)
Does the direct measurement of media:lumen ratio correlate with the indirect measurement of minimal vascular resistance in human small resistance arteries?
Effect estimate: r = 0.74
p-value: p=<0.001
Direct measurement of media:lumen ratio of small resistance vessels significantly correlates with indirect forearm minimal vascular resistance, validating the use of both techniques for evaluating vascular morphology.
Supports concurrent validity of direct and indirect vascular measures in research; leaves open clinical utility pending outcome data.
Background For the evaluation in humans of structural alterations in resistance arteries, most studies have used an indirect index, the measurement of minimal vascular resistance (mean blood pressure divided by maximal postischaemic blood flow) in suitable vascular beds. A sensitive and specific micromyographic technique was recently made available for the study of human small resistance arteries. Whether a correlation really exists between results obtained with the two techniques has not yet been investigated. Objective To evaluate both forearm minimal vascular resistance and media: lumen ratio of omental or subcutaneous small arteries in normotensive subjects and hypertensive patients. Design and methods Thirty-four individuals were included in the study (age range 35–74 years; 24 hypertensive, 10 normotensive). Twenty-five had elective abdominal surgery and nine hypertensive patients had a gluteal biopsy. Omental and subcutaneous small arteries were dissected and mounted on a wire micromyograph (Mulvany's technique), and media: lumen ratio and media thickness were measured. The dose-response curve to noradrenaline was constructed at cumulative concentrations from 3 ± 10–9 to 3 ± 10–5 mol/l. Venous occlusion plethysmography was used to measure blood flow in the forearm, and minimal vascular resistance was calculated from mean blood pressure and postischaemic maximal blood flow (13 min ischaemia plus exercise). Results A statistically significant correlation was found between media: lumen ratio and minimal vascular resistance (r = 0.74, P < 0.001) as well as between media: lumen ratio and systolic (r = 0.44, P < 0.01) and diastolic (r = 0.38, P < 0.05) blood pressures. Similar correlations were observed between media thickness and systolic and diastolic blood pressures. Small arteries from hypertensive patients had a significantly increased reactivity to noradrenaline (by analysis of variance) compared with those from normotensive subjects, in terms of wall tension but not of active media stress. Conclusions The present study demonstrated that the media: lumen ratio of small resistance vessels is significantly related to forearm minimal vascular resistance, suggesting that direct and indirect evaluations of vascular morphology will give similar results.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rosei et al. (1995) conducted a cross-sectional in Hypertension (n=34). Media:lumen ratio of small resistance arteries vs. Forearm minimal vascular resistance was evaluated on Correlation between media: lumen ratio and minimal vascular resistance (r = 0.74, p=<0.001). The media:lumen ratio of small resistance vessels was significantly correlated with forearm minimal vascular resistance (r = 0.74, P < 0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: