Key result
A two-dose schedule of Sabin-strain inactivated poliovirus vaccine achieved >98% seropositivity for all three polio serotypes, demonstrating comparable immunogenicity to a standard three-dose schedule.
Why the study?
The study was conducted to assess the immunogenicity of three-dose and two-dose immunization schedules with a Chinese-manufactured Sabin-strain inactivated poliovirus vaccine.
Does a 3-dose schedule of sIPV compared to a 2-dose schedule improve immunogenicity in infants?
RCT (n=560)
Open-label
1:1 block randomization scheme with a block size of eight
Yes
Does a 3-dose schedule of sIPV compared to a 2-dose schedule improve immunogenicity in infants?
A 2-dose schedule of sIPV provides comparable seropositivity and higher antibody titres than a 3-dose schedule, offering a dose-sparing strategy.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supports 2-dose sIPV as a dose-sparing option with non-inferior seropositivity in infants; extends RCT evidence for optimized polio schedules.
Background We assessed immunogenicity of three-dose and two-dose immunization schedules with a Sabin-strain inactivated poliovirus vaccine (sIPV) produced by one Chinese vaccine manufacturer. Methods This was an open label, randomized, controlled trial conducted in 16 vaccination clinics in Shandong province. Infants were allocated randomly to either a 3-dose study arm (sIPV administered at 2, 3, and 4 months of age) or a 2-dose arm (sIPV administered at 4 and 8–11 months of age). Poliovirus neutralizing antibodies were measured in sera collected prior to the first sIPV dose and one month after the last dose. Findings We enrolled 560 infants; 536 (95.7%) completed the study. Final seropositivity rates were >98% for all three serotypes in both study arms. There were no statistically significant differences in seropositivity between the 2-dose and the 3-dose schedule. Final median reciprocal titres of polio antibodies were high overall (>1:768 for all serotypes) and statistically significantly higher in 2-dose recipients compared with 3-dose recipients ( p < 0.001). Interpretation This study offers evidence that two doses of sIPV administered at 4 and 8–11 months of age and three doses of sIPV administered at 2, 3, and 4 months of age both provide serological protection against poliomyelitis. Median reciprocal titres of polio antibodies were high overall, and were more related to the interval between doses than the number of doses, with the longer interval of the 2-dose schedule producing higher reciprocal titres than the shorter-interval 3-dose schedule. The protection provided by the 3-dose schedule is achieved earlier in life than the protection with the 2-dose schedule. Countries planning to use an IPV-only schedule in the post-eradication era can consider this 2-dose sIPV option as an immunogenic and dose-sparing strategy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wang et al. (2021) conducted an RCT in Poliomyelitis (n=560). Sabin-strain inactivated poliovirus vaccine (sIPV) vs. 3 doses (at 2, 3, and 4 months of age) was evaluated on Serotype 1 seroprevalence one month after the last sIPV dose (p=1.000). A two-dose schedule of Sabin-strain inactivated poliovirus vaccine achieved >98% seropositivity for all three polio serotypes, demonstrating comparable immunogenicity to a standard three-dose schedule.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: