Key result
Schedules containing 3 or 4 doses of sIPV provided better protection against poliovirus type 2 than the current sIPV-sIPV-bOPV-bOPV schedule in children aged 4 years.
Why the study?
Sabin inactivated and bivalent oral poliovirus vaccines (sIPV, bOPV) have been commonly used in China since 2016, motivating evaluation of immune persistence and the immunogenicity and safety of a booster dose at age 4 years.
Does a booster dose of sIPV or bOPV improve immunogenicity in 4-year-old children previously immunized with different sequential schedules?
RCT (n=387)
Open-label
randomised
Does a booster dose of sIPV or bOPV improve immunogenicity in 4-year-old children previously immunized with different sequential schedules?
At least two sIPV doses are needed in the routine poliovirus immunization schedule, and 3-4 doses provide better protection against type 2 poliovirus.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supports revising China's polio schedule to ≥2 sIPV doses for type 2 protection; extends RCT evidence on sequential regimen persistence.
Background: Sabin inactivated and bivalent oral poliovirus vaccine (sIPV, bOPV) were commonly used in China since 2016. We conducted an open-label, randomised, controlled phase 4 trial to assess immune persistence following sequential immunisation with sIPV or bOPV, and immunogenicity and safety of a booster dose of poliovirus vaccine in children aged 4 years. Methods: Participants from a previous clinical trial with three different sequential schedules with sIPV (I) or bOPV (B) at ages 2, 3, and 4 months (Groups I-B-B, I-I-B, I-I-I) in 2017 were followed-up. The children were further divided into five subgroups after sIPV was given for Group I-B-B, and sIPV or bOPV randomly given for Group I-I-B and Group I-I-I (128 children in Groups I-B-B-I, 60 in Group I-I-B-B, 64 in Group I-I-B-I, 68 in Group I-I-I-B, 67 in Group I-I-I-I). Immune persistence and immunogenicity were assessed by measuring poliovirus type-specific antibodies, and safety were analysed in all children who received the booster dose. No serious adverse events occurred during the study. Interpretation: Our findings suggest that at least two sIPV doses are needed in the current routine poliovirus immunisation schedule, and schedules containing 3 or 4 doses of sIPV provide better protection against poliovirus type 2 than the current sIPV-sIPV-bOPV-bOPV schedule in China. Funding: Medical and Health Science and Technology of Zhejiang Province (2021KY118). This trial was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04576910).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tang et al. (2023) conducted an RCT in Poliovirus immunization (n=387). Sabin inactivated poliovirus vaccine (sIPV) or bivalent oral poliovirus vaccine (bOPV) booster vs. Different sequential schedules was evaluated on Immune persistence and immunogenicity (poliovirus type-specific antibodies) (p=>0.05). Schedules containing 3 or 4 doses of sIPV provided better protection against poliovirus type 2 than the current sIPV-sIPV-bOPV-bOPV schedule in children aged 4 years.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: