Key result
High-altitude coal mine workers demonstrated significantly higher peak heart rates, energy expenditure, and altered blood compositions compared to workers at low-altitude sites.
Why the study?
Differences between underground and aboveground mining at both high and low altitudes on cardiopulmonary functions and metabolism had received little attention in the literature.
Does high-altitude mining affect cardiopulmonary functions and metabolism compared to low-altitude mining in coal mine workers?
Cross-Sectional (n=71)
Yes
Does high-altitude mining affect cardiopulmonary functions and metabolism compared to low-altitude mining in coal mine workers?
p-value: p=<0.001
High-altitude mining presents significant physiological challenges, including increased heart rate, energy expenditure, and altered metabolic markers compared to low-altitude mining.
High-altitude mining was associated with greater cardiopulmonary and metabolic demands; leaves open causal effects and need for prospective outcome studies.
(1) Background: While previous studies revealed how underground mining might adversely affect the cardiopulmonary functions of workers, this study further investigated the differences between under- and aboveground mining at both high and low altitudes, which has received little attention in the literature. (2) Methods: Seventy-one healthy male coal mine workers were recruited, who had worked at least 5 years at the mining sites located above the ground at high (>3900 m; n = 19) and low (<120 m; n = 16) altitudes as well as under the ground at high (n = 20) and low (n = 16) altitudes. Participants’ heart rates, pulmonary functions, total energy expenditure and metabolism were measured over a 5-consecutive-day session at health clinics. (3) Results: Combining the results for both above- and underground locations, workers at high-altitude mining sites had significantly higher peak heart rate (HR), minimum average HR and training impulse as well as energy expenditure due to all substances and due to fat than those at low-altitude sites. They also had significantly higher uric acid, total cholesterol, creatine kinase and N-osteocalcin in their blood samples than the workers at low-altitude mining sites. At underground worksites, the participants working at high-altitude had a significantly higher average respiratory rate than those at low-altitude regions. (4) Conclusion: In addition to underground mining, attention should be paid to high-altitude mining as working under a hypoxia condition at such altitude likely presents physiological challenges.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wang et al. (2022) conducted a cross-sectional in Healthy coal mine workers (n=71). High-altitude mining worksites vs. Low-altitude mining worksites was evaluated on Peak heart rate (main effect of altitude) (p=<0.001). High-altitude coal mine workers demonstrated significantly higher peak heart rates, energy expenditure, and altered blood compositions compared to workers at low-altitude sites.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: