Key result
Imperceptible flow assist applied during early inspiration significantly reduced inspiratory time and integrated respiratory muscle pressure per breath in awake normal humans.
Why the study?
Does the timing of flow assist affect inspiratory time and respiratory muscle pressure in awake normal humans?
Does the timing of flow assist affect inspiratory time and respiratory muscle pressure in awake normal humans?
This study demonstrates that vagal feedback modulates breathing on a breath-by-breath basis in conscious humans, with early inspiratory flow assist effectively shortening inspiratory time.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Vagal feedback modulates breathing breath-by-breath in awake humans; hypothesis-generating for assisted ventilation in disease, with no practice change warranted.
Imperceptible levels of proportional assist ventilation applied throughout inspiration reduced inspiratory time (TI) in awake humans. More recently, the reduction in TI was associated with flow assist, but flow assist also reaches a maximum value early during inspiration. To test the separate effects of flow assist and timing of assist, we applied a pseudorandom binary sequence of flow-assisted breaths during early, late, or throughout inspiration in eight normal subjects. We hypothesized that imperceptible flow assist would shorten TI most effectively when applied during early inspiration. Tidal volume, integrated respiratory muscle pressure per breath, TI, and TE were recorded. All stimuli (early, late, or flow assist applied throughout inspiration) resulted in a significant increase in inspiratory flow; however, only when the flow assist was applied during early inspiration was there a significant reduction in TI and the integrated respiratory muscle pressure per breath. These results provide further evidence that vagal feedback modulates breathing on a breath-by-breath basis in conscious humans within a physiological range of breath sizes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
BuSha et al. (2002) studied Healthy (normal subjects) (n=8). Flow-assisted breaths vs. Different timing of assist (early, late, or throughout inspiration) was evaluated on Inspiratory time (TI) and integrated respiratory muscle pressure per breath. Imperceptible flow assist applied during early inspiration significantly reduced inspiratory time and integrated respiratory muscle pressure per breath in awake normal humans.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: