Key result
Clinicians perceived group visits for advance care planning as highly useful for older adults with heart failure, primarily to provide general education and prime the pump for subsequent discussions.
Why the study?
Advance care planning is critical for older adults with heart failure, but barriers exist and little is known about clinician perceptions or likelihood of referral for group visits.
What are clinician perspectives on group visits for advance care planning among older adult patients with heart failure and their caregivers?
What are clinician perspectives on group visits for advance care planning among older adult patients with heart failure and their caregivers?
Clinicians perceive group visits for advance care planning in heart failure as valuable for general education and priming subsequent discussions, highlighting the need for careful patient selection.
Supports exploring group visits for HF advance care planning; leaves open efficacy, formats, and selection criteria for trials.
BACKGROUND: Advance care planning (ACP) is critical for older adults with heart failure; however, patient-level and clinician-level barriers exist. Although a group visit (GV) approach to engage patients in ACP has proven effective among general geriatric populations, little is known about clinician perceptions/likelihood of referral. METHODS: Qualitative study to understand clinician perspectives on GVs for ACP among older adult patients with heart failure and caregivers. Twenty physicians and advance practice providers participated in telephone-based interviews guided by a semistructured research protocol. Transcripts were analyzed using a grounded theory approach. RESULTS: Results highlight variability in clinician engagement in ACP but greater agreement around the factors that prompt discussions. Qualitative themes included (1) inherent properties of GVs (characteristics that make GVs ideal for most but less ideal for some, risk-to-benefit ratio); (2) purpose of GVs (general education, "priming the pump" for subsequent discussions, providing tools for action); and (3) format and procedures for GVs (inclusion/exclusion considerations, organizing by unifying characteristic, link back to clinicians). CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study to gain clinician insights into ACP GVs specific to patients and caregivers affected by heart failure. Results shed light on an important topic and suggest key considerations for conducting GVs for ACP.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kogan et al. (2021) studied Heart Failure (n=20). Group visits for advance care planning was evaluated on Clinician perspectives on group visits for advance care planning. Clinicians perceived group visits for advance care planning as highly useful for older adults with heart failure, primarily to provide general education and prime the pump for subsequent discussions.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: