Key result
Elevated mean pulse pressure (>57.39 mmHg) within 24 hours after endovascular thrombectomy was independently associated with a higher risk of unfavorable functional outcomes at 3 months (aOR 2.39).
Why the study?
Previous post-operative BP management focused on SBP and DBP after IVT, leaving it unresolved whether pulse pressure affects prognosis in ischemic stroke patients after EVT.
Does mean pulse pressure within 24 hours after endovascular thrombectomy predict functional outcomes, sICH, and mortality in patients with ischemic stroke?
Cohort (n=587)
No
Does mean pulse pressure within 24 hours after endovascular thrombectomy predict functional outcomes, sICH, and mortality in patients with ischemic stroke?
Odds Ratio: 2.39 (95% CI 1.58–3.62)
p-value: p=<0.001
Mean pulse pressure within 24 hours after endovascular thrombectomy is a strong, independent predictor of functional outcomes, sICH, and mortality in ischemic stroke patients, outperforming SBP or DBP alone.
Background Previous guidelines for post-operative blood pressure (BP) management have focused on SBP and DBP in stroke patients who have undergone intravenous thrombolysis (IVT). Whether pulse pressure (PP) affects the prognosis of patients with ischemic stroke after endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) remains an unresolved issue. Methods In this study, we systematically collected twelve BP parameters within 24 hours after thrombectomy and regularly followed up to assess the mRS scores. We utilized univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses to identify predictive factors for poor prognosis and morality following EVT. Restrictive cubic splines (RCS) are used to evaluate the dose-effect relationship between PP and outcome events. Subgroup analyses were conducted to assess the prognostic efficacy of mean PP across different patient groups, with a favorable outcome defined as a modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score between 0 and 3 at three months post-EVT. Results Post-EVT SBP data were available for 587/826 patients. Mean PP demonstrates a significant positive dose-response relationship with the occurrence of functional outcomes, sICH, and mortality after EVT. The predictive power and strength of association of mean PP with prognosis are superior to those of single SBP or DBP alone with the strongest ORs and highest diagnostic performance. Mean PP exhibits a linear relationship with all other outcome events, except for mortality at 12 months post-EVT. Conclusion The mean PP within 24 hours after EVT is an independent risk factor for sICH, prognosis, and mortality in stroke patients, with a stronger association and diagnostic performance than either SBP or DBP. Achieving consistent long-term control of SBP and PP may be beneficial for improving the prognosis of ischemic stroke patients. What is already known on this topic It has been confirmed that the post-procedure blood pressure (BP) are closely related to the onset and progression of stroke. Previous guidelines for postoperative blood pressure (BP) management have focused on SBP and DBP in stroke patients who have undergone intravenous thrombolysis (IVT). Whether pulse pressure (PP) affects the prognosis of patients with ischemic stroke after endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) remains an unresolved issue. What this study adds Mean PP demonstrates a significant positive dose-response relationship with the occurrence of functional outcomes, sICH, and mortality after thrombectomy. The predictive power and strength of association of mean PP with prognosis are superior to those of single SBP or DBP alone with the strongest ORs and highest diagnostic performance (AUC=0.661, 95% CI 0.617 to 0.705). How this study might affect research, practice or policy In Clinical, we usually focus on controlling post-procedure SBP or DBP after EVT. In this study, we demonstrated that the mean PP within 24 hours after EVT is an independent risk factor for sICH, prognosis, and mortality in stroke patients. Achieving consistent long-term control of SBP and PP may be beneficial for improving the prognosis of ischemic stroke patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Li et al. (2024) conducted a cohort in Acute ischemic stroke with large vessel occlusion (n=587). Elevated mean pulse pressure (>57.39 mmHg) vs. Lower mean pulse pressure (<57.39 mmHg) was evaluated on Unfavorable functional prognosis (mRS 4-6) at 3 months (aOR 2.39, 95% CI 1.58-3.62, p=<0.001). Elevated mean pulse pressure (>57.39 mmHg) within 24 hours after endovascular thrombectomy was independently associated with a higher risk of unfavorable functional outcomes at 3 months (aOR 2.39).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: