Why the study?
Does MAC BAR anesthesia with replete intravascular volume prevent hypertension during aortic cross-clamping in patients undergoing abdominal aortic surgery?
Does MAC BAR anesthesia with replete intravascular volume prevent hypertension during aortic cross-clamping in patients undergoing abdominal aortic surgery?
Adequate intravascular volume allowing for MAC BAR anesthesia may prevent the hypertensive response typically seen during aortic cross-clamping.
To the Editor: When we provide general anesthesia for abdominal aortic surgery, must we expect a "significant increase in mean arterial pressure" occasioned by aortic clamping [1]? Is hypertension truly "the most dramatic and consistent component in hemodynamic response to aortic cross-clamping" [1]? Gelman et al.'s recent canine subjects maintained a central venous pressure of 3 mm Hg during anesthesia and while suprarenal aortic cross-clamping provoked a 30% increase in arterial blood pressure [1]. Clinically attainable general anesthesia can block adrenergic and cardiovascular responses to skin incision [2] and, as seen in daily practice, to aortic manipulations. However, such an anesthetic, of a 2-MAC (minimum alveolar anesthetic concentration) magnitude [2], requires a replete intravascular volume for stable hemodynamics to be maintained. Another series of aortic surgery patients who did not experience significant changes of mean arterial pressure upon aortic cross-clamping [3] perhaps fared thusly because they could better accommodate a MAC BAR (minimal alveolar concentration to block adrenergic response, equaling 2.05-MAC) [2] anesthetic; their baseline central venous pressure was 11 mm Hg [3]. In essence, a more generous intravascular volume allows MAC BAR anesthesia, which begets unaltered blood pressure during aortic clamping, as witnessed in clinical practice and in print [3,4]. Daniel B. Gould, MD Department of Anesthesiology, St. Louis Regional Medical Center, St. Louis, MO 63112
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Daniel B. Gould (1995) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: