Key result
Patients responding to cardiac resynchronization therapy after one year (late responders) had a similar incidence of death or heart failure hospitalization compared to early responders (30.0% vs 23.5%, p=0.711), which was significantly lower than non-responders (77.8%, p=0.037).
Why the study?
Do late responders to cardiac resynchronization therapy have different echocardiographic, electrocardiographic, and clinical outcomes compared to early responders and non-responders?
Cohort (n=36)
No
Do late responders to cardiac resynchronization therapy have different echocardiographic, electrocardiographic, and clinical outcomes compared to early responders and non-responders?
Absolute Event Rate: 30% vs 23.5%
p-value: p=0.711
Late responders to CRT (after 1 year) achieve similar long-term clinical outcomes to early responders, highlighting the importance of maintaining QRS shortening.
BACKGROUND: Response to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is commonly assessed after 6 or 12 months. We evaluated subsequent echocardiographic changes, serial QRS duration, and clinical outcomes in patients showing delayed responses to CRT after 12 months. METHODS: Among all patients who received CRT in Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, 36 one-year survivors were enrolled. Indicators of a positive CRT response were ≥ 15% reduction in left ventricular end-systolic volume (LVESV) or ≥ 10% increase in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) on any follow up echocardiogram. We defined the early responders as patients responding before one year, the late responders as patients responding after one year, and the non-responders as patients who did not respond on any follow-up echocardiogram. RESULTS: We identified 17 early responders, 10 late responders, and 9 non-responders. The late responders showed modest improvement in LVESV and LVEF at two years after CRT. QRS duration was shortened the day after CRT in all three groups. Narrowed QRS was maintained for two years in early and late responders, whereas it was continuously prolonged over time in non-responders. Incidence of all-cause death or heart failure hospitalization was comparable between early and late responders, while non-responders showed worst prognosis. CONCLUSION: Patients responding to CRT after one year show modest echocardiographic improvement but clinical outcome is similar to early responders. Shorter baseline QRS duration and long-term maintenance of QRS duration shortening are important features of the late responders to CRT.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Choi et al. (2017) conducted a cohort in Heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (n=36). Late response to cardiac resynchronization therapy vs. Early responders and non-responders was evaluated on Composite of all-cause death or heart failure hospitalization (p=0.711). Patients responding to cardiac resynchronization therapy after one year (late responders) had a similar incidence of death or heart failure hospitalization compared to early responders (30.0% vs 23.5%, p=0.711), which was significantly lower than non-responders (77.8%, p=0.037).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: