Why the study?
Although ERAS protocols reduce complications and hospital length of stay in elective colorectal procedures, their application in emergency settings such as obstructive colorectal cancer remains underexplored.
Does modified ERAS protocol implementation reduce hospital length of stay in patients undergoing emergency colorectal resection surgery for obstructive colorectal cancer?
Does modified ERAS protocol implementation reduce hospital length of stay in patients undergoing emergency colorectal resection surgery for obstructive colorectal cancer?
Implementation of a modified ERAS protocol in emergency colorectal cancer surgeries is associated with a reduced hospital length of stay.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Hypothesis-generating for modified ERAS in emergency OCRC; RCTs needed before practice change.
Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocols have been widely applied in elective colorectal procedures, demonstrating reductions in complications and Hospital Length of Stay (LOS). However, application in emergency settings such as Obstructive Colorectal Cancer (OCRC) is still underexplored. This retrospective analytical observational study examined the correlation between modified ERAS protocol implementation and LOS in OCRC patients at Saiful Anwar General Hospital, Malang, between January 2022 and January 2024. A total of 45 patients undergoing emergency colorectal resection surgery were categorized based on ERAS adherence. Data were analyzed using Spearman correlation and independent t-test. A significant negative correlation was observed between ERAS adherence and LOS (r=-0.304; P=0.042), particularly in postoperative components (r=-0.389; P=0.009). The mean LOS for patients undergoing resection with anastomosis was 7.83±4.53 days, while those with stoma had 7.30±3.63 days (P=0.751). These results support the potential benefit of applying ERAS even in emergency colorectal cancer surgeries to enhance recovery and optimize hospital resources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sugiharto et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: