Why the study?
Patients undergoing TMVR have a high incidence of AF, and their comorbidities increase both stroke and bleeding risks, making stroke prophylaxis problematic.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
A significant proportion (50%) of patients undergoing TMVR are candidates for LAAC due to high rates of concurrent atrial fibrillation and elevated bleeding and stroke risks.
OBJECTIVE: Identify patients undergoing transcatheter mitral valve repair (TMVR) who could potentially benefit from alternative ischemic stroke prophylaxis utilizing a left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) device. BACKGROUND: Patients undergoing TMVR have a high incidence of atrial fibrillation (AF). The co-morbidities which qualify them to undergo TMVR also increase their risk of stroke and bleeding, making stroke prophylaxis problematic. METHODS: We conducted a single-center retrospective study, in which the bleeding and stroke risk of all patients undergoing TMVR for degenerative mitral valve disease were reviewed to determine candidacy for a LAAC device for stroke prevention as an alternative to chronic anticoagulation. RESULTS: AF was present in 122 (62%) of TMVR patients with an average CHA2DS2-VASc score of 3.99. 23% of TMVR patients had a history of prior major bleeding event, predominately gastrointestinal bleed. Fifty-three and 47% of TMVR patients were at high or intermediate risk of bleeding, respectively, according to their HAS-BLED score. 50% of patients undergoing TMVR would qualify for LAAC device based on risk assessments. CONCLUSION: Patients undergoing TMVR represent a high risk group of AF patients that may benefit from a LAAC device.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lane et al. (2019) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: