Anisosmotic solutions modulate the amplitude of the slowly activating delayed-rectifier K+ current (IKs) in guinea-pig ventricular myocytes without changing current gating.
Osmotic IKs modulation may influence repolarization in stressed myocytes; leaves open relevance to human arrhythmias or heart failure.
AIMS: The aims of the study were to determine the effects of anisosmotic bathing solution on selected properties of I(Ks), the slowly activating delayed-rectifier K(+) current important for repolarization of the action potential in cardiac cells. METHODS AND RESULTS: Guinea-pig ventricular myocytes were voltage-clamped using either the ruptured-patch or perforated-patch technique, and the amplitude, time course, and voltage dependence of I(Ks) were determined before [isosmotic (1T)] and during superfusion of hyposmotic (<1T) or hyperosmotic (>1T) bathing solution. Hyposmotic solution increased the amplitude of I(Ks), and hyperosmotic solution decreased it. Anisosmotic-induced changes in I(Ks) amplitude were complete in 2-5 min, well-maintained, reversible, and not accompanied by significant changes in I(Ks) time course and voltage dependence. There was little difference in the results obtained with the ruptured-patch technique and those obtained with the perforated-patch technique. The amplitude of I(Ks) was sensitive to small (±10%) changes in osmolarity, maximally increased by hyposmotic solution with T < 0.7, and strongly decreased by hyperosmotic solution with T > 1.5. Experimental data on a plot of relative (1T = 1.0) I(Ks) amplitude vs. the reciprocal of relative osmolarity are well-described by a Hill equation that has a lower asymptote of 0.0, an upper asymptote of 2.0, and a slope factor of 1.87 ± 0.07. CONCLUSION: Modulation of I(Ks) amplitude by anisosmotic solution is independent of patch configuration, unaccompanied by changes in current gating, and well-described by a Hill dose-response relation that predicts relatively strong responses of I(Ks) to small perturbations in external osmolarity.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Missan et al. (2011) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: