Why the study?
Does Tempol improve lipid profile and prevent left ventricular hypertrophy in LDLr-/- mice on a high-fat diet?
Does Tempol improve lipid profile and prevent left ventricular hypertrophy in LDLr-/- mice on a high-fat diet?
Tempol attenuates dyslipidemia and left ventricular hypertrophy in a mouse model of high-fat diet-induced atherosclerosis.
May support Tempol investigation in cardiometabolic models; hypothesis-generating and should not change practice.
Introduction and Objective Dyslipidemia is associated with increased risk of cardiovascular disease and atherosclerosis, and hence with high morbidity and mortality. This study investigated the effects of the nitroxide 4-hydroxy-2,2,6,6-tetramethylpiperidine 1-oxyl (Tempol) on lipid profile and cardiac morphology in low-density lipoprotein (LDL) receptor gene knockout (LDLr-/-) mice. Methods Male LDLr-/- mice (three months old, approximately 22 g weight) were divided into the following groups: controls, including (1) standard chow (SC, n=8) and (2) high-fat diet (HFD, n=8); and treatment, including (3) standard chow + Tempol (SC+T, n=8) (30 mg/kg administered by gavage, once daily) and (4) high-fat diet + Tempol (HFD+T, n=8) (30 mg/kg). After 30 days of the diet/treatment, whole blood was collected for analysis of biochemical parameters (total cholesterol, triglycerides [TG], high-density lipoprotein [HDL], LDL, and very low-density lipoprotein [VLDL]). The heart was removed through thoracotomy and histological analysis of the left ventricle was performed. Results A significant increase in TG, LDL, and VLDL and marked left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) were demonstrated in the HFD group relative to the SC group (p<0.05), while Tempol treatment (HFD+T group) significantly (p<0.05) prevented increases in the levels of these lipid profile markers and attenuated LVH compared with the HFD group. Conclusion In this study, Tempol showed potential for the prevention of events related to serious diseases of the cardiovascular system.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gonçalves et al. (2017) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: