Key result
Atenolol was associated with lower unadjusted 6-month mortality compared with metoprolol tartrate and comparable outcomes to carvedilol in patients with LV dysfunction.
Why the study?
Does atenolol improve survival compared to carvedilol or metoprolol tartrate in patients with left ventricular systolic dysfunction?
Observational (n=974)
Does atenolol improve survival compared to carvedilol or metoprolol tartrate in patients with left ventricular systolic dysfunction?
Atenolol may be associated with comparable survival to carvedilol and better survival than metoprolol tartrate in patients with left ventricular systolic dysfunction, suggesting it may be a viable option pending randomized trial data.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May support atenolol as alternative in LV dysfunction; leaves open randomized confirmation versus carvedilol or metoprolol tartrate.
Metoprolol succinate, carvedilol, and bisoprolol are approved for use in heart failure. Other beta-blockers have been found to be inferior (metoprolol tartrate) or have not been studied (atenolol). The authors compared all-cause mortality following treatment with either atenolol, carvedilol, or metoprolol tartrate for 974 patients with left ventricular function < or =40%. The unadjusted mortality at 6 months was lower with atenolol (3.2%) and carvedilol (4.2%) when compared with metoprolol tartrate (7.5%, P< or =.039). However, patients with atenolol were older but had less prior heart failure. After adjustment for the propensity to be treated with atenolol, patients actually treated with atenolol had a significantly lower risk of death compared with treatment with metoprolol tartrate and comparable outcome to those treated with carvedilol. These results suggest that atenolol may be useful for patients with heart failure treatment and highlight the need for a randomized trial comparing atenolol with established beta-blockers.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kapoor et al. (2009) conducted an observational in left ventricular systolic dysfunction (n=974). Atenolol vs. Metoprolol tartrate and carvedilol was evaluated on all-cause mortality (p=<=0.039). Atenolol was associated with lower unadjusted 6-month mortality compared with metoprolol tartrate and comparable outcomes to carvedilol in patients with LV dysfunction.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: