Key result
The frequency position of the Doppler peak in strongly focused Gaussian beam scattering is defined by the angle of speckle observation and the relation between waist beam diameter and flow inhomogeneity size.
The traditional Doppler method of blood flow measurement using strongly focused Gaussian beam diffraction requires revision based on new theoretical and experimental findings regarding the Doppler peak.
Traditional Doppler blood flow measurement may require revision; leaves open updated models of focused-beam speckle dynamics.
Based on theoretical and experimental analyses, it is shown that the spectrum of intensity fluctuations contains a high-frequency peak in the absence of a subsidiary reference wave at nonsmall angles of speckle observation. This phenomenon, interpreted as a new type of manifestation of the Doppler effect, is usual only for the case of strongly focused coherent beam scattering. The possibilities for using the observed effect in the measurements of blood and lymph flows in narrow native capillaries are discussed. The traditional Doppler method using strongly focused Gaussian beam scattering is also considered. It is shown that the frequency position of the Doppler peak in the spectrum of intensity fluctuations is defined not only by the angle of speckle observation but also by the relation between the waist beam diameter and the average size of flow inhomogeneities. This result was experimentally verified. It is concluded that the Doppler method of blood flow measurement using strongly focused Gaussian beam diffraction should be revised.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sergey S. Ulyanov (1995) studied Blood and lymph flow measurements. Doppler method using strongly focused Gaussian beam scattering was evaluated on Frequency position of the Doppler peak in the spectrum of intensity fluctuations. The frequency position of the Doppler peak in strongly focused Gaussian beam scattering is defined by the angle of speckle observation and the relation between waist beam diameter and flow inhomogeneity size.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: