Key result
Routine protocol endomyocardial biopsy beyond 6 months post-heart transplant had a significantly lower yield for detecting rejection compared to symptom-triggered biopsy (0.1% vs 83.0%, P < .0001).
Why the study?
The optimal duration and frequency of routine surveillance endomyocardial biopsy have been questioned following declines in acute allograft rejection.
Does routine protocol endomyocardial biopsy beyond 6 months post-HT improve the detection of rejection compared to symptom-triggered biopsy in heart transplant recipients?
Cohort (n=220)
No
Does routine protocol endomyocardial biopsy beyond 6 months post-HT improve the detection of rejection compared to symptom-triggered biopsy in heart transplant recipients?
Absolute Event Rate: 0.1% vs 83%
p-value: p=< .0001
Routine protocol endomyocardial biopsy beyond 6 months post-heart transplant is a low-yield screening modality for rejection and may not be necessary.
May support limiting routine EMB beyond 6 months post-HT; leaves open optimal noninvasive alternatives in contemporary practice.
The optimal duration and frequency of routine surveillance endomyocardial biopsy (EMB) have been questioned in the current era of heart transplantation (HT), where the advances in immunosuppression and donor selection strategies have led to a decline in acute allograft rejection. We investigated the utility of routine EMB beyond 6 months post-HT. A single-center retrospective review was performed on 2963 EMBs from 220 HT recipients over 10 years. Each EMB was categorized into protocol or symptom-triggered biopsy and reviewed for rejection. Heart transplant recipients with ≥2 known risk factors for rejection were designated as an elevated risk group. The majority of rejections occurred within 3 months following HT. The yield of routine protocol EMBs was significantly lower than symptom-triggered EMBs, not only during the first 6 months post-HT (1.6% vs. 33.3%, P < .0001), but more so during the 6-12 months (0.1% vs 83.0%, P < .0001). A similar pattern was observed in heart transplant recipients at both elevated and standard risk for rejection. In conclusion, EMB was found to be a low-yield screening modality for rejection beyond 6 months post-HT.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Oh et al. (2020) conducted a cohort in Heart transplantation (n=220). Routine protocol endomyocardial biopsy vs. Symptom-triggered endomyocardial biopsy was evaluated on Yield of rejection during 6-12 months post-HT (p=< .0001). Routine protocol endomyocardial biopsy beyond 6 months post-heart transplant had a significantly lower yield for detecting rejection compared to symptom-triggered biopsy (0.1% vs 83.0%, P < .0001).
Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: