Key result
Type-I left-right bicuspid aortic valve hemodynamic stresses did not change MMP-2 or MMP-9 expression or MMP-2 activity compared to tricuspid valve stresses.
Why the study?
Does type-I LR-BAV hemodynamic stress promote remodeling in porcine aortic wall concavity compared to TAV stress?
Does type-I LR-BAV hemodynamic stress promote remodeling in porcine aortic wall concavity compared to TAV stress?
Hemodynamic stress from type-I LR-BAV does not significantly alter MMP expression or activity in the concavity of porcine ascending aortas compared to TAV stress.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Does not implicate Type-I LR-BAV hemodynamics in MMP-mediated remodeling; leaves open alternative mechanisms in BAV aortopathy.
AIM: To investigate the role of type-I left-right bicuspid aortic valve (LR-BAV) hemodynamic stresses in the remodeling of the thoracic ascending aorta (AA) concavity, in the absence of underlying genetic or structural defects. METHODS: Transient wall shear stress (WSS) profiles in the concavity of tricuspid aortic valve (TAV) and LR-BAV AAs were obtained computationally. Tissue specimens excised from the concavity of normal (non-dilated) porcine AAs were subjected for 48 h to those stress environments using a shear stress bioreactor. Tissue remodeling was characterized in terms of matrix metalloproteinase (MMP) expression and activity via immunostaining and gelatin zymography. RESULTS: Immunostaining semi-quantification results indicated no significant difference in MMP-2 and MMP-9 expression between the tissue groups exposed to TAV and LR-BAV AA WSS (P = 0.80 and P = 0.19, respectively). Zymography densitometry revealed no difference in MMP-2 activity (total activity, active form and latent form) between the groups subjected to TAV AA and LR-BAV AA WSS (P = 0.08, P = 0.15 and P = 0.59, respectively). CONCLUSION: The hemodynamic stress environment present in the concavity of type-I LR-BAV AA does not cause any significant change in proteolytic enzyme expression and activity as compared to that present in the TAV AA.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Samantha K. Atkins (2016) studied Bicuspid aortic valve hemodynamics. Type-I left-right bicuspid aortic valve (LR-BAV) hemodynamic stresses vs. Tricuspid aortic valve (TAV) hemodynamic stresses was evaluated on Matrix metalloproteinase (MMP-2 and MMP-9) expression and activity (p=0.80). Type-I left-right bicuspid aortic valve hemodynamic stresses did not change MMP-2 or MMP-9 expression or MMP-2 activity compared to tricuspid valve stresses.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: