Key result
High HFA-PEFF scores (5-6) were associated with higher 10-year overall mortality compared to intermediate and low scores (21.3% vs 10.1% vs 4.3%, P<0.001).
Why the study?
The routine diagnosis of HFpEF remains challenging, and the predictive value of the HFA-PEFF score regarding mortality, symptom burden, and functional status needed evaluation in a large cohort.
Does the HFA-PEFF score predict mortality, symptom burden, and functional status in patients at risk for HFpEF?
Observational (n=1,668)
Yes
Does the HFA-PEFF score predict mortality, symptom burden, and functional status in patients at risk for HFpEF?
Absolute Event Rate: 21.3% vs 4.3%
p-value: p=<0.001
The HFA-PEFF score effectively stratifies patients at risk for HFpEF, with higher scores strongly predicting 10-year mortality and cardiovascular events.
Supports HFA-PEFF stratification in at-risk patients; leaves open whether score-guided management improves outcomes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hashemi et al. (2022) conducted an observational in Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) risk (n=1,668). High HFA-PEFF score (5-6) vs. Intermediate (2-4) and low HFA-PEFF scores was evaluated on overall mortality (p=<0.001). High HFA-PEFF scores (5-6) were associated with higher 10-year overall mortality compared to intermediate and low scores (21.3% vs 10.1% vs 4.3%, P<0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: