Key result
Canagliflozin increased proteinuria regression compared to glimepiride (27.5% vs 10.7%, P=0.0001) in T2DM and CHF patients, an effect associated with higher baseline insulin levels.
Why the study?
Factors associated with proteinuria regression in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus treated with canagliflozin were unclear.
Does canagliflozin improve proteinuria regression compared to glimepiride in patients with T2DM and CHF?
RCT (n=214)
Does canagliflozin improve proteinuria regression compared to glimepiride in patients with T2DM and CHF?
In patients with T2DM and CHF, canagliflozin promotes proteinuria regression more effectively than glimepiride, an effect associated with higher pretreatment insulin levels.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Canagliflozin may enhance proteinuria regression versus glimepiride in T2DM with CHF; leaves open causal effects and need for RCTs.
AIM: To investigate factors associated with proteinuria regression in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) treated with canagliflozin. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study was a post hoc analysis of the CANDLE trial (UMIN000017669), which compared the effect of 24 weeks of treatment with canagliflozin or glimepiride for changes in N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide in patients with T2DM and chronic heart failure (CHF). Factors associated with regression of proteinuria at 24 weeks were evaluated with multivariate logistic models. RESULTS: The rate of regression of proteinuria was higher (28/102, 27.5% vs. 12/112, 10.7%), and that of progression was lower (9/102, 8.8% vs. 26/112, 23.2%), in the canagliflozin versus the glimepiride group (P = .0001). There were no differences in the change in the estimated glomerular filtration rate category between groups. Insulin level, homeostatic model assessment of β-cell function, homeostatic model assessment for insulin resistance and estimated plasma volume were decreased at 24 weeks in the regression subclass but not in the progression subclass, suggesting that regression of proteinuria is associated with the declines in these values in the canagliflozin group. Higher insulin level at baseline was solely associated with proteinuria regression in the multivariate logistic regression model (baseline insulin, as per a 1-mlU/L increase, odds ratio 1.24 [1.05-1.47], P = .011). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with T2DM and CHF, regression of proteinuria with canagliflozin treatment was associated with the pretreatment insulin level. These results may provide clinicians with novel mechanistic insights into the beneficial effects of canagliflozin on renal outcomes and may warrant discussion for selecting preferred patient profiles, including pretreatment insulin levels.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yamaguchi et al. (2022) conducted an RCT in Type 2 diabetes mellitus and chronic heart failure (n=214). Canagliflozin vs. Glimepiride was evaluated on Regression of proteinuria at 24 weeks (p=0.0001). Canagliflozin increased proteinuria regression compared to glimepiride (27.5% vs 10.7%, P=0.0001) in T2DM and CHF patients, an effect associated with higher baseline insulin levels.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: