Key result
Flow-directed pulmonary artery occlusion pressure analysis showed increased upstream vascular resistance in operable proximal CTEPH compared with inoperable CTEPH.
Why the study?
Does flow-directed pulmonary artery occlusion pressure analysis distinguish operable proximal CTEPH from inoperable distal CTEPH and IPAH/CTD-PAH?
Observational (n=47)
Does flow-directed pulmonary artery occlusion pressure analysis distinguish operable proximal CTEPH from inoperable distal CTEPH and IPAH/CTD-PAH?
Flow-directed pulmonary artery occlusion pressure analysis can partition pulmonary vascular resistance and may help distinguish operable proximal CTEPH from inoperable distal disease.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May aid CTEPH operability assessment via upstream resistance partitioning; leaves open prospective validation before clinical adoption.
Flow-directed pulmonary artery occlusion is posited to enable partitioning of vascular resistance into small and large vessels. As such it may have a role in assessment for pulmonary endarterectomy. To test if the occlusion technique distinguished small from large vessel disease we studied 59 subjects with chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH), idiopathic pulmonary arterial hypertension (IPAH), and connective tissue disease (CTD)-associated PAH. At right heart catheterisation, occlusion pressures were recorded. With fitting of the pressure decay curve, pulmonary vascular resistance was partitioned into downstream (small vessels) and upstream (large vessels, Rup). 47 patients completed the study; 14 operable CTEPH, 15 inoperable CTEPH, 13 idiopathic or CTD-PAH and five post-operative CTEPH. There was a significant difference in mean Rup in the proximal operable CTEPH group 87.3 (95% CI 84.1-90.5); inoperable CTEPH mean 75.8 (95% CI 66.76-84.73), p=0.048; and IPAH/CTD, mean 77.1 (95% CI 71.86-82.33), p=0.003. Receiver operating characteristic curves to distinguish operable from inoperable CTEPH demonstrated an area under the curve of 0.75, p=0.0001. A cut-off of 79.3 gave 100% sensitivity (95% CI 73.5-100%) but 57.1% specificity (95% CI 28.9-82.3%). In a subgroup analysis of multiple lobar sampling there was demonstrable heterogeneity. Rup is significantly increased in operable proximal CTEPH compared with non-operable distal CTEPH and IPAH/CTD-PAH. Rup variability in patients with CTEPH and PAH is suggestive of pathophysiological heterogeneity.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Toshner et al. (2012) conducted an observational in Chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH), idiopathic pulmonary arterial hypertension (IPAH), and connective tissue disease (CTD)-associated PAH (n=47). Flow-directed pulmonary artery occlusion pressure analysis vs. Inoperable CTEPH and IPAH/CTD-PAH was evaluated on Mean upstream vascular resistance (Rup) (p=0.048). Flow-directed pulmonary artery occlusion pressure analysis showed increased upstream vascular resistance in operable proximal CTEPH compared with inoperable CTEPH.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: