Why the study?
Does thromboembolism prophylaxis reduce the incidence of deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism in admitted patients?
Population
22,030 patients admitted to a single academic medical center
Comparison
Thromboembolism prophylaxis vs No prophylaxis or alternative prophylactic methods
Design
Cohort
Authors
Loading...
Mechanical prophylaxis linked to low failure in this cohort; leaves open optimal regimen selection pending randomized trials.
Does thromboembolism prophylaxis reduce the incidence of deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism in admitted patients?
Thromboembolism prophylaxis effectively reduces the incidence of DVT and PE in hospitalized patients, with mechanical methods like pneumatic compression showing high efficacy, underscoring the need for individualized risk assessment.
Proctor et al. (2001) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: