Key result
Prior CABG was associated with lower diagnostic accuracy of hs-cTnI for myocardial infarction compared to no prior CABG.
Why the study?
While hs-cTnT and the ESC 0/1h-hs-cTnT-algorithm perform worse in patients with prior CABG, it was unknown whether this applies to hs-cTnI.
Does prior CABG affect the diagnostic accuracy of hs-cTnI and the efficacy of the ESC 0/1h-hs-cTnI-algorithms in patients with suspected MI?
Observational (n=5,200)
Yes
Does prior CABG affect the diagnostic accuracy of hs-cTnI and the efficacy of the ESC 0/1h-hs-cTnI-algorithms in patients with suspected MI?
While hs-cTnI and the ESC 0/1h algorithm maintain high sensitivity and specificity in patients with prior CABG, their overall diagnostic accuracy and efficacy are significantly lower compared to patients without prior CABG.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
hs-cTnI accuracy and ESC 0/1h efficacy are reduced post-CABG; hypothesis-generating for tailored thresholds before practice change.
BACKGROUND: High-sensitivity cardiac troponin T (hs-cTnT) and the ESC 0/1h-hs-cTnT-algorithm have worse performance in the early diagnosis of myocardial infarction (MI) in patients with prior coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). It is unknown, whether this concern applies also to hs-cTnI, the most widely used analyte worldwide. METHODS: In an international multicenter diagnostic study, two cardiologists centrally adjudicated the final diagnosis in patients presenting to the emergency department with symptoms suggestive of MI according to the Third Universal Definition of MI. The objective was to compare the diagnostic accuracy of hs-cTnI assays and their performance within the ESC hs-cTnI 0/1h-algorithms in patients with versus without prior CABG. Findings were externally validated in an U.S. multicenter diagnostic study. RESULTS: A total of 392/5'200 patients (8%) had prior coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). Diagnostic accuracy of hs-cTnI as quantified by the area under the receiver-operating characteristics-curve (AUC) in these patients was high, but lower versus patients without prior CABG (e.g. hs-cTnI-Architect 0.91 versus 0.95; p = 0.016). Sensitivity/specificity of rule-out/in by the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) 0/1h-hs-cTnI-algorithms remained very high [e.g. hs-cTnI-Architect 100% and 93.5%], but efficacy was lower (52% versus 74%, p < 0.01). External validation (n = 2113) confirmed these findings in 192 patients with prior CABG using hs-cTnI-Atellica, with 52% versus 36% (p < 0.001) remaining in the observe zone. CONCLUSIONS: Diagnostic accuracy of hs-cTnI and efficacy of the ESC 0/1h-hs-cTnI-algorithms are lower in patients with prior CABG, but sensitivity/specificity remain very high. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00470587, number NCT00470587.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Koechlin et al. (2022) conducted an observational in Myocardial infarction (n=5,200). Prior coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) vs. No prior CABG was evaluated on Diagnostic accuracy of hs-cTnI (AUC) (p=0.016). Prior CABG was associated with lower diagnostic accuracy of hs-cTnI for myocardial infarction compared to no prior CABG.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: