Key result
In patients with prior CABG, cMyC demonstrated an AUC of 0.88 (95% CI 0.85-0.92) for diagnosis of myocardial infarction, which was comparable but not superior to established hs-cTnT and hs-cTnI assays.
Why the study?
Diagnosing myocardial infarction in patients with prior CABG is challenging due to lower diagnostic accuracy of hs-cTn assays, and cMyC may offer improved performance.
Does cMyC measurement improve diagnostic accuracy for myocardial infarction compared to hs-cTnT and hs-cTnI in adult patients presenting to the ED with acute chest discomfort and prior CABG?
Observational (n=4,752)
Yes
Does cMyC measurement improve diagnostic accuracy for myocardial infarction compared to hs-cTnT and hs-cTnI in adult patients presenting to the ED with acute chest discomfort and prior CABG?
Effect estimate: AUC 0.88 (95% CI 0.85-0.92)
Absolute Event Rate: 0.88% vs 0.89%
In patients with prior CABG presenting with acute chest discomfort, cMyC offers high diagnostic accuracy for myocardial infarction, but it does not outperform established high-sensitivity troponin assays.
May aid MI diagnosis post-CABG; leaves open whether cMyC should replace hs-cTn in practice.
Background Diagnosing myocardial infarction in patients with prior coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) remains challenging, primarily because of lower diagnostic accuracy of high‐sensitivity cardiac troponin (hs‐cTn). cMyC (cardiac myosin‐binding protein C), because of its faster release kinetics and greater abundance, may offer improved diagnostic performance in this population. Methods The diagnostic accuracy of cMyC was directly compared with that of hs‐cTnT and hs‐cTnI in a prospective, international, multicenter, diagnostic study enrolling adult patients presenting to the emergency department with acute chest discomfort. Final diagnoses were centrally adjudicated by 2 independent cardiologists using all available clinical and study‐specific data, including imaging and serial hs‐cTnT measurements. Patients were stratified according to the presence or absence of prior CABG. Results Among 4752 patients, 387 (8%) had prior CABG (median age, 75 years; 86% men). The incidence of myocardial infarction was significantly higher in patients with prior CABG (38% versus 16%; P <0.001). In the CABG group, the diagnostic accuracy of cMyC as quantified by the area under the curve was 0.88 (95% CI, 0.85–0.92), which was comparable but not superior to that of hs‐cTnT (0.89 [95% CI, 0.86–0.92]) and hs‐cTnI (0.88 [95% CI, 0.84–0.91]). These findings were consistent across alternative high‐sensitivity cMyC assays. Conclusions In patients with prior CABG, cMyC demonstrated high diagnostic accuracy for myocardial infarction, but not superior to established hs‐cTnT and hs‐cTnI assays. Registration URL: clinicaltrials.gov ; Unique Identifier: NCT00470587.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Odermatt et al. (2026) conducted an observational in Myocardial infarction in patients with prior coronary artery bypass grafting (n=4,752). Cardiac Myosin-Binding Protein C (cMyC) vs. High-sensitivity cardiac troponin T (hs-cTnT) and I (hs-cTnI) was evaluated on Diagnostic accuracy for myocardial infarction (area under the curve) (AUC 0.88, 95% CI 0.85-0.92). In patients with prior CABG, cMyC demonstrated an AUC of 0.88 (95% CI 0.85-0.92) for diagnosis of myocardial infarction, which was comparable but not superior to established hs-cTnT and hs-cTnI assays.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: