Key result
The proposed non-contact machine vision system demonstrated a highly significant correlation with conventional contact methods for measuring heart rate (Pearson's correlation coefficient = 0.9994, RMSE = 0.32).
Why the study?
Does a non-contact machine vision system accurately measure cardiorespiratory signals in multiple persons compared to conventional contact methods?
Does a non-contact machine vision system accurately measure cardiorespiratory signals in multiple persons compared to conventional contact methods?
Effect estimate: PCC 0.9994
A novel machine vision system using video magnification and advanced signal processing can accurately track cardiorespiratory signals from multiple subjects simultaneously without contact.
May enable contactless multi-person monitoring; leaves open clinical validation and outcome impact.
Most existing non-contact monitoring systems are limited to detecting physiological signs from a single subject at a time. Still, another challenge facing these systems is that they are prone to noise artifacts resulting from motion of subjects, facial expressions, talking, skin tone, and illumination variations. This paper proposes an efficient non-contact system based on a digital camera to track the cardiorespiratory signal from a number of subjects (up to six persons) at the same time with a new method for noise artifact removal. The proposed system relied on the physiological and physical effects as a result of the activity of the cardiovascular and respiratory systems, such as skin color changes and head motion. Since these effects are imperceptible to the human eye and highly affected by the noise variations, we used advanced signal and video processing techniques, including developing video magnification technique, complete ensemble empirical mode decomposition with adaptive noise, and canonical correlation analysis to extract the heart rate and respiratory rate from multiple subjects under the noise artifact assumptions. The experimental results of the proposed system had a significant correlation (Pearson's correlation coefficient = 0.9994, Spearman correlation coefficient = 0.9987, and root mean square error = 0.32) when compared with the conventional contact methods (pulse oximeter and piezorespiratory belt), which makes the proposed system a promising candidate for novel applications.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Its licence doesn't allow us to show a copy here.
Al‐Naji et al. (2017) studied Healthy (n=18). Machine vision system with noise artifact removal vs. Conventional contact methods (pulse oximeter and piezorespiratory belt) was evaluated on Correlation of heart rate measurements with reference methods (stationary scenario) (PCC 0.9994). The proposed non-contact machine vision system demonstrated a highly significant correlation with conventional contact methods for measuring heart rate (Pearson's correlation coefficient = 0.9994, RMSE = 0.32).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: