Key result
NOS I-/- mice demonstrated a significantly reduced osteoclast response in vivo and decreased bone resorption in vitro compared to wild type controls.
Why the study?
Does targeted deletion of NOS I reduce osteoclast activity and inflammatory bone resorption in mice?
Does targeted deletion of NOS I reduce osteoclast activity and inflammatory bone resorption in mice?
This study demonstrates a critical role for NOS I in inflammatory bone resorption and osteoclast function in vitro and in vivo.
Bone resorption is responsible for the morbidity associated with a number of inflammatory diseases such as rheumatoid arthritis, orthopedic implant osteolysis, periodontitis and aural cholesteatoma. Previous studies have established nitric oxide (NO) as a potentially important mediator of bone resorption. NO is a unique intercellular and intracellular signaling molecule involved in many physiologic and pathologic pathways. NO is generated from L-arginine by the enzyme nitric oxide synthase (NOS). There are three known isoforms of NOS with distinct cellular distributions. In this study, we have used mice with targeted deletions in each of these isoforms to establish a role for these enzymes in the regulation of bone resorption in vivo and in vitro. In a murine model of particle induced osteolysis, NOS I-/- mice demonstrated a significantly reduced osteoclast response. In vitro, osteoclasts derived from NOS I-/- mice were larger than wild type controls but demonstrated decreased resorption. Although NOS I has been demonstrated in osteoblasts and osteocytes as a mediator of adaptive bone remodeling, it has not previously been identified in osteoclasts. These results demonstrate a critical role for NOS I in inflammatory bone resorption and osteoclast function in vitro.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jung et al. (2003) studied Inflammatory bone resorption. NOS I deletion (NOS I-/-) vs. Wild type controls was evaluated on Osteoclast response and bone resorption. NOS I-/- mice demonstrated a significantly reduced osteoclast response in vivo and decreased bone resorption in vitro compared to wild type controls.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: