Key result
A positive dipyridamole echocardiography test was associated with a significantly higher rate of new cardiac events compared to a negative test (45% vs 22%; p < 0.05).
Why the study?
Does a positive dipyridamole echocardiography test predict new heart events in patients with suspected ischemic heart disease?
Cohort (n=105)
Does a positive dipyridamole echocardiography test predict new heart events in patients with suspected ischemic heart disease?
Absolute Event Rate: 45% vs 22%
p-value: p=< 0.05
Dipyridamole echocardiography testing is an effective noninvasive method for predicting future cardiac events in patients with suspected ischemic heart disease.
Supports prognostic utility in suspected IHD; leaves open whether results should alter management pending prospective validation.
The aim of this study was to follow the results of dipyridamole echocardiography testing (DET) in 105 patients (mean age 53.2 ± 8.5 years) with suspected ischemic heart disease. The follow-up period was 31.4 ± 4.2 months. Twenty-nine patients had a positive DET result, and 76 a negative one. Fifty-two of the 105 underwent coronarography, and the remainder had no heart catheterization. In the follow-up study, the patients' subjective condition and the new heart events (angina, infarction, coronary bypass surgery, and death) were registered. The new heart events were more frequent in the DET-positive group than the negative one (45% vs 22%; p < 0.05). In the coronarography-positive and -negative group these values were 77% and 10%, respectively ( p < 0.001). In the coronarography- and DET-positive group the frequency of new cardiac events was 69%. This value was only 10% in the coronarography- and DET-negative group. The difference between the true-positive and true-negative groups was highly significant ( p < 0.001). Coronarography was found to be a good predictor of future cardiac events, however, the noninvasive dipyridamole echocardiography testing was also an appropriate method for follow-up.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gruber et al. (2005) conducted a cohort in suspected ischemic heart disease (n=105). Positive dipyridamole echocardiography testing (DET) vs. Negative dipyridamole echocardiography testing (DET) was evaluated on new heart events (angina, infarction, coronary bypass surgery, and death) (p=< 0.05). A positive dipyridamole echocardiography test was associated with a significantly higher rate of new cardiac events compared to a negative test (45% vs 22%; p < 0.05).
Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: