Key result
Left atrial appendage anatomical characteristics, including volume, volume index, and shape, were not significantly different between patients with and without atrial fibrillation recurrence following catheter ablation.
Why the study?
Do left atrial appendage anatomical characteristics predict atrial fibrillation recurrence or correlate with previous stroke/TIA in patients with persistent AF undergoing catheter ablation?
Cohort (n=59)
No
Do left atrial appendage anatomical characteristics predict atrial fibrillation recurrence or correlate with previous stroke/TIA in patients with persistent AF undergoing catheter ablation?
Absolute Event Rate: 11% vs 9.7%
p-value: p=0.26
Non-chicken wing LAA morphology is associated with a history of stroke/TIA in patients with persistent AF, but LAA anatomical characteristics do not appear to predict AF recurrence after pulmonary vein isolation.
LAA anatomy does not predict post-ablation AF recurrence in this cohort; leaves open its association with prior stroke/TIA in persistent AF.
BACKGROUND: Despite technological and scientific efforts, the recurrence rate of persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) remains high. Several studies have shown that in addition to pulmonary vein (PV) isolation other non-PV triggers, particularly left atrial appendage may be the source of initiation and maintenance of AF. There are few studies showing the role of left atrial appendage (LAA) isolation in order to obtain higher success rate in persistent AF patients. OBJECTIVE: We analyzed the LAA volume, volume index and shape relative to the LA in patients with persistent AF undergoing AF ablation. METHODS: Fifty-nine consecutive patients with persistent AF who underwent catheter ablation were enrolled. Computerized tomography (CT) was performed in order to assess left atrial and PV anatomy including the LAA. Digital subtraction software (GE Advantage Workstation 4.3) was used to separate the LAA from the LA and calculate: LA volume (LAV), LA volume index (LAV/body surface area), LAA volume (LAAV), LAA volume index (LAA volume/LA volume), and LAA morphology [chicken wing (CW) or non-chicken wing (NCW)]. RESULTS: , p=0.71; LAA shape of NCW 50 % vs 52 %, p=0.75, respectively). LAV was significantly correlated with the LAAV (r: o.47, p=0.009). The incidence of NCW LAA was significantly higher in patients with previous stroke/TIA (80 % vs. 20 %, p=0.04). CONCLUSION: The LAA anatomical characteristics (volume/volume index and the shape) were comparable in patients with/out AF recurrence post PVI. It remains to be determined if additional LAA isolation will impact outcomes in patients with persistent AF.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gül et al. (2017) conducted a cohort in Persistent Atrial Fibrillation (n=59). Left atrial appendage characteristics (volume, volume index, shape) vs. Patients without AF recurrence was evaluated on Left atrial appendage volume (LAAV) in patients with vs without AF recurrence (p=0.26). Left atrial appendage anatomical characteristics, including volume, volume index, and shape, were not significantly different between patients with and without atrial fibrillation recurrence following catheter ablation.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: