Why the study?
Does severe pulmonary hypertension worsen hemodynamic and echocardiographic outcomes in patients undergoing mitral valve replacement for rheumatic mitral stenosis compared to mild pulmonary hypertension?
Cohort
Does severe pulmonary hypertension worsen hemodynamic and echocardiographic outcomes in patients undergoing mitral valve replacement for rheumatic mitral stenosis compared to mild pulmonary hypertension?
Severe pulmonary hypertension does not significantly worsen most operative and early post-operative hemodynamic outcomes of mitral valve replacement for rheumatic mitral stenosis compared to mild pulmonary hypertension, despite longer hospital stays and larger LV dimensions at 3 months.
Severe PH-associated longer stays and larger LV dimensions warrant monitoring but should not change practice; leaves open independent prognostic impact in rheumatic MS surgery.
Background We performed this study to evaluate the effects of pulmonary hypertension (PH) severity on the hemodynamic and echocardiographic outcomes of mitral valve replacement (MVR) for rheumatic mitral stenosis (MS). Methods Patients with rheumatic MS were divided into two groups: Group-A with mean pulmonary arterial pressure (mPAP) equal to 26–40 mmHg and group-B with mPAP > 55 mmHg. We compared the hemodynamic and arterial blood gases (ABG) data between both groups. Results Our analysis showed no significant difference between mild and severe PH groups in terms of all analyzed baseline and pre-operative data (p < 0.05), except for NYHA class distribution and O 2 saturation on room-air, which were better in the mild PH group. Moreover, post-induction ABG data and heart rate were similar between both groups; however, post-induction central venous pressure (p = 0.01) and systolic blood pressure (p < 0.001) were significantly higher in the severe PH group, compared to the mild PH. All analyzed hemodynamic and ABG data in the 24 post-operative hours were comparable between both groups. The hospital stay duration was significantly longer (p = 0.01) in the severe PH group than the mild PH group. Concerning the echocardiographic data at three-months of follow-up, the left atrial size was comparable (p = 0.4) between both groups; however, the left ventricular end-systolic (p = 0.009) and end-diastolic (p = 0.01) dimensions were significantly higher in the severe PH group, compared to the mild PH group. Conclusions Our study showed that both mild and severe PH groups were comparable in most operative and post-operative hemodynamic and ABG outcomes of MVR surgery.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mohammad et al. (2018) conducted a cohort in rheumatic mitral stenosis. Severe pulmonary hypertension (mPAP > 55 mmHg) vs. Mild pulmonary hypertension (mPAP 26-40 mmHg) was evaluated on hemodynamic and echocardiographic outcomes.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: