Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to compare the automated and manual choroidal thickness (CT) measures in normal eyes using swept-source optical coherence tomography (SS-OCT). Patients and Methods: This prospective study included 80 eyes from 40 normal volunteers. CT was measured manually and automatically in all eyes using Topcon deep-range imaging-1 SS-OCT. Automatically calculated measures, which are shown as a colored topographic map with nine subfields, defined by the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) style grid, compared to manual measures at the subfoveal area, at four points 1 mm around the fovea as well as at four points 3 mm around the fovea. Results: The mean subfoveal CT (SFCT) was 271.77 ± 78.78 μm for the automatically measured ETDRS map and 282.81 ± 83.74 μm for the manual SFCT measurements. The difference between manual and automated measurement was the smallest in SFCT at 11.03 ± 35 μm and the greatest in the outer temporal area at 48.36 ± 49.83 μm. Manually measured CT was significantly higher ( P < 0.001) in all nine areas compared to automated ETDRS map measurements. Conclusions: Manual measurement of CT is significantly higher than automated measurements. In addition, they cannot replace automated methods.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Abdelazeem et al. (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: