Key result
Right ventricular outflow tract placement of pacing/defibrillating leads was safe and efficacious, with 0 lead dislodgments or device failures over a mean follow-up of 22.5 months.
Why the study?
Is right ventricular outflow tract (RVOT) placement of defibrillation leads safe and efficacious?
Observational (n=112)
Is right ventricular outflow tract (RVOT) placement of defibrillation leads safe and efficacious?
RVOT placement of pacing-defibrillation leads is safe and efficacious, offering a viable alternative to right ventricular apex pacing without associated device failures or dislodgments.
Supports RVOT defibrillator lead placement in select patients; leaves open need for larger prospective validation.
Over a 5-year period, 112 patients (89 male/23 female, mean age 65 years) underwent right ventricular outflow tract (RVOT) placement of permanent active-fixation transvenous pacing/defibrillating leads. At implantation, the pacing threshold was 0.6 +/- 0.3 V at 0.5 ms pulse duration and R wave amplitude was 10.9 +/- 4.9 mV. The defibrillation threshold (DFT) of right-sided implants was 17.7 +/- 3.4 J while that of left-sided implants was 16.1 +/- 3.3 J. Patients were followed at 1 and 3 month postimplant and at six-month intervals thereafter. At mean follow-up of 22.5 +/- 17.5 months (range 1-47 months) there were no lead dislodgments, unsuccessful shock therapies, or failure to sense or pace for bradycardia or tachycardia. Death was not sudden in the 17 patients who died. We conclude that RVOT pacing-defibrillation lead implantation is safe, efficacious, and potentially attractive because preliminary evidence suggests that it may not be associated with the adverse hemodynamic effects of pacing at the right ventricular apex.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Giudici et al. (2004) conducted an observational in Patients requiring permanent active-fixation transvenous pacing/defibrillating leads (n=112). Right ventricular outflow tract (RVOT) placement of permanent active-fixation transvenous pacing/defibrillating leads was evaluated on Lead dislodgments, unsuccessful shock therapies, or failure to sense or pace for bradycardia or tachycardia. Right ventricular outflow tract placement of pacing/defibrillating leads was safe and efficacious, with 0 lead dislodgments or device failures over a mean follow-up of 22.5 months.
Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: