Key result
Clinically significant incidental aortic arch abnormalities were detected in 8.3% of patients on neck MR angiography and were significantly associated with coexisting non-aortic arterial abnormalities.
Why the study?
The aortic arch is often overlooked as an anatomical blind spot on neck MR angiography, and the prevalence and potential clinical significance of incidental aortic arch abnormalities needed investigation.
What is the prevalence and clinical significance of incidental aortic arch abnormalities detected on contrast-enhanced neck MR angiography?
Observational (n=348)
No
What is the prevalence and clinical significance of incidental aortic arch abnormalities detected on contrast-enhanced neck MR angiography?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Incidental aortic arch abnormalities are present in 8.3% of neck MR angiograms and correlate with other arterial abnormalities, highlighting the need for careful evaluation of this anatomical blind spot.
Background and Objectives: Vascular abnormalities within the anatomical coverage are frequently encountered in imaging studies. The aortic arch is often overlooked as an anatomical blind spot, especially in neck magnetic resonance (MR) angiography. This study investigated the prevalence of incidental aortic arch abnormalities. We also estimated the potential clinical significance of aortic arch abnormalities as blind spots detected on contrast-enhanced neck MR angiography. Materials and Methods: Between February 2016 and March 2023, 348 patients were identified based on contrast-enhanced neck MR angiography reports. The clinical and radiological characteristics of the patients and the presence of additional imaging studies were assessed. The aortic arch abnormalities and coexisting non-aortic arterial abnormalities were classified into two categories according to their clinical significance. We performed the χ2 test and Fisher’s exact test for group comparisons. Results: Of the 348 study patients, only 29 (8.3%) had clinically significant incidental aortic arch abnormalities. Among these 348 patients, 250 (71.8%) and 136 (39%) had intracranial and extracranial abnormalities, respectively; the clinically significant intracranial abnormalities in the two groups were 130 lesions (52.0%) and 38 lesions (27.9%), respectively. In addition, there was a significantly higher tendency of clinically significant aortic arch abnormalities (13/29, 44.8%) in the patients who had clinically significant coexisting non-aortic arterial abnormalities than in the other group (87/319, 27.3%) (p = 0.044). The patient groups with clinically significant intracranial or extracranial arterial abnormalities had higher rates of clinically significant aortic abnormalities (31.0% and 17.2%), but there was no statistical significance (p = 0.136). Conclusions: The incidence of clinically significant aortic arch abnormalities was 8.3% on neck MR angiography, with a significant association between aortic and coexisting non-aortic arterial abnormalities. The findings of this study could improve the understanding of incidental aortic arch lesions on neck MR angiography, which is of crucial clinical importance for radiologists to achieve accurate diagnoses and management.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hwang et al. (2023) conducted an observational in Incidental aortic arch abnormalities (n=348). Contrast-enhanced neck MR angiography was evaluated on Clinically significant incidental aortic arch abnormalities. Clinically significant incidental aortic arch abnormalities were detected in 8.3% of patients on neck MR angiography and were significantly associated with coexisting non-aortic arterial abnormalities.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: