Key result
Enhanced AVSH reduced the median percentage of right ventricular pacing compared to standard AVSH (4.0% vs 5.5%, P<0.001), although the primary hypothesis was not met.
Why the study?
Does enhanced AVSH reduce the percentage of right ventricular pacing compared to standard AVSH in patients without permanent AV block?
RCT (n=178)
crossover
Does enhanced AVSH reduce the percentage of right ventricular pacing compared to standard AVSH in patients without permanent AV block?
Absolute Event Rate: 4% vs 5.5%
p-value: p=<0.001
Enhanced AVSH modestly reduces the percentage of right ventricular pacing compared to standard AVSH, particularly in patients with intermittent AV block.
Primary hypothesis unmet despite modest RV pacing reduction; extends AVSH comparisons without supporting practice change.
BACKGROUND: Right ventricular pacing predisposes to the development of heart failure and atrial fibrillation. Automatic atrioventricular search hysteresis (AVSH) is a commonly used strategy to decrease the percentage of right ventricular pacing (%VP) in patients without permanent AV block, but the results have not been optimal. METHODS: The randomized, crossover PREVENT study evaluated whether an enhanced AVSH with two new features can reduce %VP compared with standard AVSH. The new features are the repetitive hysteresis [switch from extended to basic AV delay after a consistent loss of intrinsic AV conduction (IAVC) lasting for six consecutive atrial cycles] and the scan hysteresis (periodic IAVC search extension over six consecutive atrial cycles). Both standard AVSH and enhanced AVSH performed a periodic IAVC search every 180 cardiac cycles and operated with a basic AV-delay of 225 ms and a rate-independent maximum AV-delay of 300 ms for paced and sensed atrial events. RESULTS: Among 178 patients, 53.4% had no evidence of AV block at enrollment and 46.6% had history of intermittent AV block. The median %VP was decreased by enhanced AVSH compared to standard AVSH (4.0% vs 5.5%, P < 0.001), particularly in patients with a history of AV block (21.4% vs 25.5%, P < 0.001). The primary study hypothesis that 25% of all patients would experience > 20% relative %VP reduction was not met as 46 (25.8%) patients (95% confidence interval, 20.5-31.8%) presented such relative reduction. CONCLUSION: The enhanced AVSH algorithm reduces %VP compared with standard AVSH in patients with intermittent AV block.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kolb et al. (2011) conducted an RCT in intermittent AV block or no AV block (n=178). Enhanced atrioventricular search hysteresis (AVSH) vs. Standard AVSH was evaluated on median percentage of right ventricular pacing (%VP) (p=<0.001). Enhanced AVSH reduced the median percentage of right ventricular pacing compared to standard AVSH (4.0% vs 5.5%, P<0.001), although the primary hypothesis was not met.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: