Key result
Sotalol prevented the inducibility of ventricular tachycardia-ventricular fibrillation in 30% of patients compared to 20% for procainamide, a difference that was not statistically significant.
Why the study?
Does sotalol prevent the inducibility of VTVF compared to procainamide in patients with inducible ventricular tachycardia-ventricular fibrillation?
RCT (n=151)
Double-blind
parallel
Yes
Does sotalol prevent the inducibility of VTVF compared to procainamide in patients with inducible ventricular tachycardia-ventricular fibrillation?
Sotalol is comparable to procainamide in preventing inducible ventricular tachycardia-ventricular fibrillation, supporting its role in the management of symptomatic ventricular arrhythmias.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Sotalol is comparable to procainamide for suppressing inducible VT-VF; extends support for its use in ventricular arrhythmia management.
Sotalol is the prototype class III agent that combines beta-blocking properties with the propensity to prolong the effective refractory period by lengthening the action potential duration. Its precise effect on the prevention of ventricular tachycardia-ventricular fibrillation (VTVF) compared to class I agents has not been evaluated in a blinded study. In a double-blind parallel-design multicenter study, the electrophysiologic and antiarrhythmic effects of intravenous and oral sotalol (n = 55) and procainamide (n = 55) were therefore compared in patients with VTVF inducible by programmed electric stimulation. Sotalol produced a greater effect on lengthening the ventricular effective refractory period (VERP). It prevented the inducibility of VTVF in 30% versus 20% for procainamide, but this was not significantly different. In an alternate therapy group (n = 41) of similar patients previously refractory to or intolerant of procainamide, intravenous sotalol prevented inducibility in 32%. The pooled overall sotalol efficacy rate was 31%. There was a significant relation between the increase in the VERP and the prevention of inducibility of VTVF (n = 56; p < 0.02). VERP of > or = 300 msec was critical for the prevention of VTVF inducibility. Thirteen sotalol and 6 procainamide responders from the randomized group and 30 from the nonrandomized groups completed 1 year of oral sotalol therapy follow-up. Life-table analysis of these patient in each group showed a trend in favor of sotalol; however, statistical analysis was not possible because of the small numbers of patients. Both sotalol and procainamide were well tolerated. In the randomized group there was one case of sudden death during treatment with sotalol and two cases of nonfatal torsades de pointes in the procainamide group and two in the sotalol group; in the nonrandomized alternate therapy group, there were 6 cases of nonfatal torsades de pointes. The data support the emerging role of sotalol in the control of symptomatic ventricular tachycardia and fibrillation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Singh et al. (1995) conducted an RCT in Ventricular tachycardia-ventricular fibrillation (VTVF) (n=151). Sotalol vs. Procainamide was evaluated on Prevention of the inducibility of VTVF. Sotalol prevented the inducibility of ventricular tachycardia-ventricular fibrillation in 30% of patients compared to 20% for procainamide, a difference that was not statistically significant.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: