Key result
Patients with two posterior tricuspid valve leaflets had a significantly larger posterior annulus (42.4 vs 30.7 mm, P<0.001) and area (327 vs 208 mm2, P=0.006) compared to those with one leaflet.
Why the study?
Tricuspid valve morphology, particularly valves with two posterior leaflets, is attracting attention, prompting investigation into the usefulness of three-dimensional transoesophageal echocardiography for its morphological evaluation.
Does preoperative three-dimensional transoesophageal echocardiography accurately evaluate tricuspid valve morphology compared to intraoperative measurement in patients undergoing tricuspid valve repair?
Observational (n=60)
Does preoperative three-dimensional transoesophageal echocardiography accurately evaluate tricuspid valve morphology compared to intraoperative measurement in patients undergoing tricuspid valve repair?
Preoperative three-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography is a useful tool for evaluating tricuspid valve morphology, specifically identifying larger posterior leaflet annulus and area in patients with two posterior leaflets.
3D TEE distinguishes posterior leaflet dimensions by leaflet number in tricuspid repair; supports morphological assessment but leaves open impact on outcomes.
OBJECTIVES: The morphology of the tricuspid valve (TV), particularly valves with two posterior leaflets, is attracting attention. The present study was performed to investigate the usefulness of three-dimensional transoesophageal echocardiographic data for morphological evaluation of the TV . METHODS: Sixty patients underwent morphological evaluation of the TV by preoperative transoesophageal echocardiography followed by TV repair with median sternotomy, and each leaflet was measured intraoperatively. We analysed the TV morphology in 51 patients whose preoperative echocardiographic findings were consistent with intraoperative findings. RESULTS: The mid-systolic echo data, which included the annulus diameter of each leaflet, were correlated with the intraoperative evaluation findings compared with those in the mid-diastole. The annulus and area of the posterior leaflet were larger in patients with two than one posterior leaflet valve (42.4 ± 13.5 vs 30.7 ± 9.1 mm, P < 0.001 and 327 ± 185 vs 208 ± 77 mm2, P = 0.006, respectively). In the severe tricuspid regurgitation patients, the annulus of the posterior leaflet was larger and the annulus of the anterior leaflet was smaller in patients with two than one posterior leaflet valve [posterior: 48 mm [95% confidence interval (CI), 41-54 mm] vs 36 mm (95% CI, 27-45 mm), respectively; P = 0.043 and anterior: 38 mm (95% CI, 33-42 mm) vs 46 mm (95% CI, 40-52 mm), respectively; P = 0.025]. CONCLUSIONS: Patients who had a TV with two posterior leaflets had a larger annulus and area of the posterior leaflets. Preoperative three-dimensional transoesophageal echocardiography is useful for the morphological evaluation of the TV.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kawase et al. (2022) conducted an observational in Tricuspid valve disease (n=60). Two posterior tricuspid valve leaflets vs. One posterior tricuspid valve leaflet was evaluated on Annulus diameter and area of the posterior leaflet (p=<0.001). Patients with two posterior tricuspid valve leaflets had a significantly larger posterior annulus (42.4 vs 30.7 mm, P<0.001) and area (327 vs 208 mm2, P=0.006) compared to those with one leaflet.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: