Why the study?
Does periorbital ultrasound accurately detect hemodynamically significant lesions of the internal carotid artery compared to arteriography?
Does periorbital ultrasound accurately detect hemodynamically significant lesions of the internal carotid artery compared to arteriography?
Carotid Doppler examination is not reliable for detecting hemodynamically significant lesions of the internal carotid artery but is valuable for assessing collateral cerebral circulation.
Periorbital ultrasound should not yet guide carotid stenosis decisions; leaves open its role in collateral assessment pending validation studies.
The direction of supraorbital and frontal artery flow and its response to compression of the superficial temporal, facial, and angular arteries were measured in 250 carotid arteries in 114 patients. All patients had arch and/or selective carotid arteriography. The carotid arteries were placed into the following three groups: hemodynamically normal, greater than 60% occlusion of the internal carotid artery, and total occlusion of the internal carotid artery. The test's accuracy was 94.5% in the hemodynamically normal group, 68.8% in the totally occluded group, and only 51.4% in the group with hemodynamically significant stenosis. Although the carotid Doppler examination is not reliable in detecting hemodynamically significant lesions of the internal carotid artery, it is valuable in assessing the adequacy of collateral cerebral circulation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jonathan B. Towne (1979) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: