Key result
Fibrin D-dimer is associated with risks of cardiovascular diseases, including coronary heart disease, stroke, and venous thromboembolism, though its clinical utility requires further study.
Why the study?
Is Fibrin D-dimer associated with cardiovascular risk and thromboembolism?
Is Fibrin D-dimer associated with cardiovascular risk and thromboembolism?
Fibrin D-dimer levels are associated with various cardiovascular diseases, highlighting the role of activated coagulation in thromboembolism, though assay harmonization is needed for clinical utility.
Highlights coagulation's role in thromboembolism; leaves open D-dimer's clinical utility pending assay standardization and trials.
Fibrin D-dimer, the most commonly used clinical assay for detection of coagulation activation and in vivo fibrin formation and lysis in circulating blood, has been associated with risks of cardiovascular diseases in studies published over the past 15 years. This review discusses, in turn, analytic and preanalytic considerations; associations with risk factors; and associations with coronary heart disease, atrial fibrillation, stroke and cerebrovascular disease, peripheral arterial disease, and venous thromboembolism. These associations suggest that activated coagulation and in vivo fibrin formation and lysis may play a role in arterial, intracardiac, and venous thromboembolism. The potential clinical utility of D-dimer in prediction of cardiovascular risk, in indicating patient groups for prophylactic anticoagulation and in monitoring of anticoagulation, requires further study. Harmonization of results from different assays would increase clinical utility.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gordon Lowe (2005) conducted a review in Cardiovascular diseases. Fibrin D-dimer was evaluated. Fibrin D-dimer is associated with risks of cardiovascular diseases, including coronary heart disease, stroke, and venous thromboembolism, though its clinical utility requires further study.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: