Key result
Rosuvastatin reduced in-stent neointima formation by 23% compared with control (0.51 vs 0.66 mm2; P<0.05) and improved endothelial-dependent vasodilatation.
Why the study?
Does oral rosuvastatin reduce in-stent neointima formation and improve endothelial function in Wistar rats undergoing stent implantation, in the presence or absence of Angiotensin II?
RCT
two consecutive randomization steps
Does oral rosuvastatin reduce in-stent neointima formation and improve endothelial function in Wistar rats undergoing stent implantation, in the presence or absence of Angiotensin II?
Effect estimate: 23% reduction
Absolute Event Rate: 0.51% vs 0.66%
p-value: p=<0.05
Rosuvastatin effectively inhibits in-stent neointima formation and improves endothelial dilator function in a rat model, regardless of Angiotensin II levels.
Hypothesis-generating in rat stent models; leaves open translation to human restenosis prevention.
OBJECTIVE: We investigated the efficacy of oral rosuvastatin treatment to reduce in-stent neointima formation, both in the absence and presence of high levels of the proproliferative substance angiotensin II (Ang II). BACKGROUND: Drawbacks of current drug-eluting stents include inhibition of reendothelialization, induction of abnormal coronary endothelial function, and, most importantly, late in-stent thrombosis. Statin treatment might be a more subtle approach, with known beneficial vascular effects. METHODS: Wistar rats were allocated to four treatment groups by two consecutive randomization steps: one to allocate rosuvastatin 0.047% (wt/wt) supplemented rat chow, and one to implant an osmotic minipump releasing Ang II (200 ng/kg). Stents were implanted in the abdominal aorta in all groups. After 4 weeks, in-stent neointima formation and vascular function in the thoracic aorta were determined. RESULTS: In the absence of Ang II, rosuvastatin reduced neointima formation by 23% as compared with control (0.66+/-0.06 versus 0.51+/-0.02 mm2; P<0.05). The presence of Ang II enhanced neointimal area by 30%. This was inhibited to the same extent by rosuvastatin (0.88+/-0.06 versus 0.67+/-0.03 mm2; P<0.05). In parallel, rosuvastatin improved endothelial-dependent vasodilatation, both in the presence and absence of high levels of Ang II. CONCLUSION: Ang II infusion increases in-stent neointima formation and decreases endothelial function. We now provide evidence that rosuvastatin effectively inhibits in-stent neointima formation and in parallel improves endothelial dilator function, both in the presence and absence of high Ang II levels.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Harst et al. (2008) conducted an RCT in in-stent neointima formation. Rosuvastatin vs. Control was evaluated on in-stent neointima formation in the absence of Ang II (mm2) (23% reduction, p=<0.05). Rosuvastatin reduced in-stent neointima formation by 23% compared with control (0.51 vs 0.66 mm2; P<0.05) and improved endothelial-dependent vasodilatation.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: