Key result
Genetic mouse models showed no significant differences in 5-HT(2C) receptor mRNA editing profiles in Galpha(q) null mice or Galpha(q)/Galpha(11) protein levels in transgenic mice.
Genetic mouse models do not support a causal or compensatory relationship between 5-HT(2C) receptor RNA editing and G(q) protein levels.
No support for interaction in mouse models; leaves open relevance of 5-HT(2C) editing to G(q) signaling in humans.
The serotonin 2C (5-HT(2C)) receptor undergoes RNA editing at five bases in a region of the pre-mRNA encoding the second intracellular loop, generating many unique 5-HT(2C) receptor isoforms. Mechanisms regulating in vivo expression of different edited 5-HT(2C) receptor isoforms are poorly understood, as are the adaptive consequences of variation in editing profiles. Recent findings suggest a putative relationship between expression levels of Galpha(q/11) protein and the degree of editing of 5-HT(2C) receptor transcripts. To elucidate the potential regulatory or adaptive role of Galpha(q/11) protein levels, we quantified editing of 5-HT(2C) receptor RNA transcripts in Galpha(q) null mice and protein levels of Galpha(q) and Galpha(11) in transgenic male mice solely expressing either the non-edited (INI) or the fully edited (VGV) isoforms of the 5-HT(2C) receptor. Pyrosequencing of RNA isolated from amygdaloid cortex in Galpha(q) null and wild-type mice revealed no significant differences in 5-HT(2C) receptor mRNA editing profiles. Cortical tissue from INI/y, VGV/y, and wild-type mice was assayed for expression of Galpha(q) and Galpha(11) subunits by Western blotting. No differences in signal density between wild-type and INI/y or VGV/y groups were found, indicating equivalent levels of Galpha(q) and Galpha(11) protein. Together, these data do not support a causal or compensatory relationship between 5-HT(2C) receptor RNA editing and G(q) protein levels.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Canal et al. (2008) studied this question. Galpha(q) null mutation and transgenic 5-HT(2C) receptor isoforms vs. Wild-type mice was evaluated on 5-HT(2C) receptor mRNA editing profiles and Galpha(q)/Galpha(11) protein levels. Genetic mouse models showed no significant differences in 5-HT(2C) receptor mRNA editing profiles in Galpha(q) null mice or Galpha(q)/Galpha(11) protein levels in transgenic mice.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: